Remark
Tag 05P1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05P1].
Algebra, chapter II, § 3. Tensor products
(1) Let A, B be two commutative rings, a ring homomorphism and E and F two A-modules; then the canonical mapping (6) of no. 3 is a B-linear mapping
(2) What has been said in this no. can be generalized to the following case: let E be a right A-module, F a left A-module, C a commutative ring and a homomorphism of C into A such that is contained in the centre of A (cf. III, § 1, no. 3). We may then consider the C-modules and and the hypothesis on implies that these C-module structures are compatible respectively with the A-module structures on E and F (§ 1, no. 14). The tensor product is thus (by virtue of no. 4) given two C-module structures such that and
respectively for , , and Definition 1 (no. 1) shows also that these two structures are identical. If E' (resp. F') is a right (resp. left) A-module and , are two A-linear mappings, then is C-linear for the C-module structures just defined; the mapping :
is C-bilinear (for the C-module structures on and ) defined in § 1, no. 14, Remark 1), whence we also derive a C-linear mapping, called canonical
(13) .
(3) Let A be an integral domain and K its field of fractions. If E and F are two vector K-spaces, the canonical mapping
(no. 3 and § 1, no. 13) is bijective. It suffices (no. 4) to prove that if is an A-bilinear mapping of into a vector K-space G, is also K-bilinear. Now, for all in A.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.