Definition 5
Tag 05WZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05WZ].
Algebra, chapter II, § 10. Matrices
Two matrices with m rows and n columns over a ring are called equivalent if there exists an invertible square matrix of order m and an invertible square matrix of order n such that
(40)
Clearly the relation "X and X' are equivalent" is an equivalence relation (Set Theory, II, § 6, no. 1) on the set of matrices of type over A, which justifies the terminology.
With this definition, Proposition 6 of no. 8 can be stated by saying that when the bases are changed in two right A-modules E, F (with finite bases), the matrix of a linear mapping with respect to the new bases is equivalent to the matrix of with respect to the old bases.
Conversely, if relation (40) holds and is a linear mapping whose matrix is with respect to the respective canonical bases and of and , then is the matrix of with respect to the bases and such that is the matrix of passage from to and the matrix of passage from to .
Examples of equivalent matrices. (1) Two matrices and with rows and columns "differ only in the order of their rows" if there exists a permutation of the interval of , such that for every ordered pair of indices , (we also say that is obtained by performing the permutation on the rows of ). The matrices and are then equivalent, for , where is the matrix of the permutation (cf. no. 7, Example II).
Similarly and are said to differ only in the order of their columns if there exists a permutation of such that for every ordered pair of indices , and are also equivalent, for where is the matrix of the permutation .
Note that in the above notation is the matrix of passage from a basis to the basis and the matrix of passage from a basis to the basis .
(2) Let be distinct elements of and let .
Suppose that for , and for and ; is said to be derived from by adding to the column of of index the column of index multiplied on the right by . In this case and are also equivalent: for if (an invertible triangular matrix, as seen in no. 7), then .
Similarly, let be two distinct elements of and an element of ; if is derived from by adding to the row of of index the row of index multiplied on the left by , and are equivalent, for , where .
(3) Finally, if, for a given index , for , where is invertible and for and , and are equivalent; for , where is the matrix with , for . Then is said to be derived from by multiplying the column of of index on the right by .
Similarly, if is derived from by multiplying the row of of index on the left by an invertible element , and are equivalent, for where is the matrix with , for .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.