Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 05YZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05YZ].

Algebra, chapter III, § 2. Examples of algebras

Let E be a quadratic A-algebra of type (α,β)(\alpha, \beta).

(i) If A is a field and contains no element ζ\zeta such that ζ2=α+βζ\zeta^2 = \alpha + \beta \zeta, E is a (commutative) field (cf. V, § 3).

(ii) If the ring A contains an element ζ\zeta such that ζ2=α+βζ\zeta^2 = \alpha + \beta \zeta and β−2ζ\beta - 2\zeta is invertible (resp. zero), E is isomorphic to A ×\times A resp. is of type (0,0))(0, 0)).

We prove (i). Let ξ,η\xi, \eta be two elements of A and u=ξe+ηiu = \xi e + \eta i. If η≠0\eta \neq 0 and we write θ=−ξη−1\theta = -\xi \eta^{-1}, then N(u)=η2(θ2−βθ−α)\mathrm{N}(u) = \eta^2 (\theta^2 - \beta \theta - \alpha) by (5), whence N(u)≠0\mathrm{N}(u) \neq 0 by virtue of the hypothesis on A; if η=0\eta = 0, then N(u)=ξ2\mathrm{N}(u) = \xi^2. In any case, if u≠0u \neq 0, then N(u)≠0\mathrm{N}(u) \neq 0, hence N(u)\mathrm{N}(u) is invertible in A and therefore uu is invertible in E.

We now prove (ii). The canonical basis (e1,e2)(e_1, e_2) of the algebra A ×\times A is of type (0,1)(0, 1). We have seen (formula (3)) that E is of type

(αδ2−γ2−βγδ,2γ+βδ) (\alpha \delta^2 - \gamma^2 - \beta \gamma \delta, 2\gamma + \beta \delta)

for all γ∈A\gamma \in A and all δ\delta invertible in A. If β−2ζ\beta - 2\zeta is invertible, take δ=(β−2ζ)−1\delta = (\beta - 2\zeta)^{-1} and γ=−ζ(β−2ζ)−1\gamma = -\zeta (\beta - 2\zeta)^{-1}; then 2γ+βδ=12\gamma + \beta \delta = 1 and

αδ2−γ2−βγδ=δ2(α−ζ2+βζ)=0; \alpha \delta^2 - \gamma^2 - \beta \gamma \delta = \delta^2 (\alpha - \zeta^2 + \beta \zeta) = 0;

thus E is of type (0,1)(0, 1) and hence isomorphic to A ×\times A. If β−2ζ=0\beta - 2\zeta = 0, it has already been remarked that E is of type (α+ζ2,0)(\alpha + \zeta^2, 0) and hence of type (0,0)(0, 0) since α+ζ2=2ζ2−βζ=0\alpha + \zeta^2 = 2\zeta^2 - \beta \zeta = 0.

A quadratic A-algebra of type (0,0)(0, 0) is also called an algebra of dual numbers over A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.