The A-homomorphismf′=lim→fα′:lim→TAα(Mα)→TA(M)is a graded algebra isomorphism.
To simplify we write E=TA(M) and E′=lim→TAα(Mα) and let
gα:TAα(Mα)→E′
be the canonical Aα-homomorphism. Clearly the composite Aα-linear mappings MαϕMαTAα(Mα)gαE′ form a direct system and there is therefore one and only one A-linear mapping u=lim→(gα∘ϕMα):M→E′ such that
u∘fα=gα∘ϕMα
for all α. This mapping itself factorizes uniquely (no. 1, Proposition 1) into MϕME→E′, where h is an A-algebra homomorphism. It will suffice to prove that h∘f′=1E′ and f′∘h=1E.
To this end note that, for every index α, (no. 3, formula (8))
h∘fα′∘ϕMα=h∘ϕM∘fα=u∘fα=gα∘ϕMα
whence, by the uniqueness assertion of no. 1, Proposition 1,
h∘fα′=gα
for all α; it follows that (h∘f′)∘gα=gα for all α and hence h∘f′=1E′ by definition of a direct limit.
On the other hand, by virtue of no. 3, formula (8),
f′∘u∘fα=f′∘gα∘ϕMα=fα′∘ϕMα=ϕM∘fα,
whence again f′∘u=ϕM by definition of a direct limit; we conclude that f′∘h∘ϕM=ϕM and the uniqueness property of no. 1, Proposition 1 gives f′∘h=1E.
Proposition 6 can also be shown by observing that, for every integer n≥1, there is a canonical A-module isomorphism lim→TAαn(Mα)→TAn(M), as follows by induction on n from II, § 6, no. 3, Proposition 7. It is immediately verified that these isomorphisms are the restrictions of f′.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.