Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 061Q, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 061Q].

Algebra, chapter III, § 5. Tensor algebra. Tensors

The A-homomorphism f′=lim⁡→fα′:lim⁡→TAα(Mα)→TA(M)f' = \lim \rightarrow f'_\alpha : \lim \rightarrow T_{A\alpha}(M_\alpha) \to T_A(M) is a graded algebra isomorphism.

To simplify we write E=TA(M)E = T_A(M) and E′=lim⁡→TAα(Mα)E' = \lim \rightarrow T_{A\alpha}(M_\alpha) and let

gα:TAα(Mα)→E′ g_\alpha: T_{A\alpha}(M_\alpha) \to E'

be the canonical AαA_\alpha-homomorphism. Clearly the composite AαA_\alpha-linear mappings Mα→ϕMαTAα(Mα)→gαE′M_\alpha \xrightarrow{\phi_{M_\alpha}} T_{A\alpha}(M_\alpha) \xrightarrow{g_\alpha} E' form a direct system and there is therefore one and only one AA-linear mapping u=lim⁡→(gα∘ϕMα):M→E′u = \lim \rightarrow (g_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha}): M \to E' such that

u∘fα=gα∘ϕMα u \circ f_\alpha = g_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha}

for all α\alpha. This mapping itself factorizes uniquely (no. 1, Proposition 1) into M→ϕME→E′M \xrightarrow{\phi_M} E \to E', where hh is an AA-algebra homomorphism. It will suffice to prove that h∘f′=1E′h \circ f' = 1_{E'} and f′∘h=1Ef' \circ h = 1_E.

To this end note that, for every index α\alpha, (no. 3, formula (8))

h∘fα′∘ϕMα=h∘ϕM∘fα=u∘fα=gα∘ϕMα h \circ f'_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha} = h \circ \phi_M \circ f_\alpha = u \circ f_\alpha = g_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha}

whence, by the uniqueness assertion of no. 1, Proposition 1,

h∘fα′=gα h \circ f'_\alpha = g_\alpha

for all α\alpha; it follows that (h∘f′)∘gα=gα(h \circ f') \circ g_\alpha = g_\alpha for all α\alpha and hence h∘f′=1E′h \circ f' = 1_{E'} by definition of a direct limit.

On the other hand, by virtue of no. 3, formula (8),

f′∘u∘fα=f′∘gα∘ϕMα=fα′∘ϕMα=ϕM∘fα, f' \circ u \circ f_\alpha = f' \circ g_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha} = f'_\alpha \circ \phi_{M_\alpha} = \phi_M \circ f_\alpha,

whence again f′∘u=ϕMf' \circ u = \phi_M by definition of a direct limit; we conclude that f′∘h∘ϕM=ϕMf' \circ h \circ \phi_M = \phi_M and the uniqueness property of no. 1, Proposition 1 gives f′∘h=1Ef' \circ h = 1_E.

Proposition 6 can also be shown by observing that, for every integer n≥1n \geq 1, there is a canonical AA-module isomorphism lim⁡→TAαn(Mα)→TAn(M)\lim \rightarrow T^n_{A_\alpha}(M_\alpha) \to T^n_A(M), as follows by induction on nn from II, § 6, no. 3, Proposition 7. It is immediately verified that these isomorphisms are the restrictions of f′f'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.