Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 05R9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05R9].

Algebra, chapter II, § 6. Inverse and direct limits of modules

The Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping (7) is bijective.

We set P=lim⁡(Eα⊗AαFα)P = \lim (E_\alpha \otimes_{A_\alpha} F_\alpha) and, for all α∈I\alpha \in I, let hα:Eα⊗AαFα→Ph_\alpha : E_\alpha \otimes_{A_\alpha} F_\alpha \to P be the canonical mapping. On the other hand, for all α∈I\alpha \in I, let

tα:Eα×Fα→Eα⊗AαFα t_\alpha : E_\alpha \times F_\alpha \to E_\alpha \otimes_{A_\alpha} F_\alpha
be the canonical Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear mapping; for α≤β\alpha \leq \beta,
tβ(fβα(xα),gβα(yα))=fβα(xα)⊗gβα(yα)=hβα(tα(xα,yα)) t_\beta(f_{\beta \alpha}(x_\alpha), g_{\beta \alpha}(y_\alpha)) = f_{\beta \alpha}(x_\alpha) \otimes g_{\beta \alpha}(y_\alpha) = h_{\beta \alpha}(t_\alpha(x_\alpha, y_\alpha))
and hence (tα)(t_\alpha) is a direct system of mappings. Canonically identifying lim⁡(Eα×Fα)\lim (E_\alpha \times F_\alpha) with E×FE \times F (Set Theory, III, § 7, no. 7, Proposition 10), we derive a mapping t=lim⁡tα:E×F→Pt = \lim t_\alpha : E \times F \to P such that
t(fα(xα),gα(yα))=hα(tα(xα,yα))=hα(xα⊗yα). t(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), g_\alpha(y_\alpha)) = h_\alpha(t_\alpha(x_\alpha, y_\alpha)) = h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes y_\alpha).
Taking account of Set Theory, III, § 7, no. 5, Lemma 1, it is immediately seen that tt is Z\mathbf{Z}-bilinear; moreover, for x∈E,y∈F,λ∈Ax \in E, y \in F, \lambda \in A, there exists α∈I\alpha \in I such that x=fα(xα),y=gα(yα),λ=ρα(λα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha), y = g_\alpha(y_\alpha), \lambda = \rho_\alpha(\lambda_\alpha) with λα∈Aα,xα∈Eα,yα∈Fα\lambda_\alpha \in A_\alpha, x_\alpha \in E_\alpha, y_\alpha \in F_\alpha (Set Theory, III, § 3, no. 7, Lemma 1); whence
t(xλ,y)=hα((xαλα)⊗yα)=hα(xα⊗(λαyα))=t(x,λy). t(x \lambda, y) = h_\alpha((x_\alpha \lambda_\alpha) \otimes y_\alpha) = h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes (\lambda_\alpha y_\alpha)) = t(x, \lambda y).
Hence there exists one and only one Z\mathbf{Z}-linear mapping π′:E⊗AF→P\pi' : E \otimes_A F \to P such that π′(x⊗y)=t(x,y)\pi'(x \otimes y) = t(x, y) (§ 3, no. 1, Proposition 1). Moreover, by definition
π′(π(hα(xα⊗yα)))=π′(fα(xα)⊗gα(yα))=hα(xα⊗yα) \pi'(\pi(h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes y_\alpha))) = \pi'(f_\alpha(x_\alpha) \otimes g_\alpha(y_\alpha)) = h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes y_\alpha)
π(π′(fα(xα)⊗gα(yα)))=π(hα(xα⊗yα))=fα(xα)⊗gα(yα) \pi(\pi'(f_\alpha(x_\alpha) \otimes g_\alpha(y_\alpha))) = \pi(h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes y_\alpha)) = f_\alpha(x_\alpha) \otimes g_\alpha(y_\alpha)
and as the elements of the form fα(xα)⊗gα(yα)f_\alpha(x_\alpha) \otimes g_\alpha(y_\alpha) (resp. hα(xα⊗yα)h_\alpha(x_\alpha \otimes y_\alpha)) generate the Z\mathbf{Z}-module E⊗AFE \otimes_A F (resp. PP), π′∘π\pi' \circ \pi and π∘π′\pi \circ \pi' are the identity mappings.

Loosely speaking, Proposition 7 may be expressed by saying that tensor products commute with direct limits and usually the two sides of (7) are identified by means of the isomorphism π\pi.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.