Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 060F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 060F].

Algebra, chapter III, § 4. Tensor products of algebras

Let A,BA, B be two commutative rings, ρ:A→B\rho : A \to B a ring homomorphism, EE an AA-algebra and FF a BB-algebra. Then the canonical AA-module isomorphism

ρ∗(F)⊗AE→ρ∗(F⊗Bρ∗(E)) \rho_*(F) \otimes_A E \to \rho_*(F \otimes_B \rho^*(E))

(II, § 5, no. 2, Proposition 6) is an AA-algebra isomorphism.

The verifications are trivial on account of § 1, no. 5.

In particular, the AA-algebra structure on B⊗AEB \otimes_A E, obtained by restricting the ring BB of scalars to AA, is identical with the structure of the algebra B⊗AEB \otimes_A E, the tensor product of the AA-algebras BB and EE.

Finally, if (Ai,ϕji)(A_i, \phi_{ji}) is a direct system of commutative rings, (Ei,fji)(E_i, f_{ji}) and (Fi,gji)(F_i, g_{ji}) two direct systems of AiA_i-algebras (§1§ 1, no. 6) and A=lim⁡→AiA = \lim \rightarrow A_i, the canonical AA-module isomorphism

lim⁡→(Ei⊗AiFi)→(lim⁡→Ei)⊗A(lim⁡→Fi) \lim \rightarrow (E_i \otimes_{A_i} F_i) \to (\lim \rightarrow E_i) \otimes_A (\lim \rightarrow F_i)

(II, § 6, no. 3, Proposition 7) is also an AA-algebra isomorphism, as follows from the definitions.

Examples of tensor products of algebras. (1) Let AA be a commutative ring and M,NM, N two AA-modules; the canonical mapping

EndA(M)⊗AEndA(N)→EndA(M⊗AN) \text{End}_A(M) \otimes_A \text{End}_A(N) \to \text{End}_A(M \otimes_A N)

(II, § 4, no. 4) is an AA-algebra homomorphism, as follows from II, § 3, no. 2, formula (5). When MM or NN is a finitely generated projective AA-module, we know that this homomorphism is bijective (II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 4). In particular we recover the definition of the tensor product of two square matrices.

(2) Let S,TS, T be two monoids and A(S)A^{(S)} and A(T)A^{(T)} the algebras of the monoids SS and TT over the ring AA (III, § 2, no. 6); then there is a canonical AA-algebra isomorphism

A(S)⊗AA(T)→A(S×T). A^{(S)} \otimes_A A^{(T)} \to A^{(S \times T)}.

The elements es⊗ete_s \otimes e_t (resp. e(s,t)e_{(s,t)}), where ss runs through SS and tt runs through TT, form a basis of A(S)⊗AA(T)A^{(S)} \otimes_A A^{(T)} by virtue of II, § 3, no. 7, Corollary 2 to Proposition 7 (resp. of A(S×T)A^{(S \times T)}; the desired isomorphism is obtained by mapping es⊗ete_s \otimes e_t to e(s,t)e_{(s,t)} and it follows from the definitions that this is indeed an algebra isomorphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.