Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 061I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 061I].

Algebra, chapter III, § 5. Tensor algebra. Tensors

Let EE be a (unital) AA-algebra and f:M→Ef : M \to E an AA-linear mapping. There exists one and only one AA-algebra homomorphism g:T(M)→Eg : T(M) \to E such that f=g∘ϕf = g \circ \phi.

In other words, (T(M),ϕ)(T(M), \phi) is a solution of the universal mapping problem (Set Theory, IV, § 3, no. 1), where Σ\Sigma is the species of AA-algebra structure, the α\alpha-mappings being the AA-linear mappings from the module MM to an AA-algebra. Observe that here there is no question of a graduation on T(M)T(M).

For every finite family (xi)1≤i≤n(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of nn elements of MM, by definition of the product in T(M)T(M), x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn=ϕ(x1)ϕ(x2)…ϕ(xn)x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n = \phi(x_1)\phi(x_2)\ldots\phi(x_n); then necessarily g(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn)=f(x1)f(x2)…f(xn)g(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n) = f(x_1)f(x_2)\ldots f(x_n) for n≥1n \geq 1 and g(α)=αeg(\alpha) = \alpha e (if ee is the unit element of EE) for α∈A\alpha \in A, which proves the uniqueness of gg. Conversely, note that, for all n>0n > 0, the mapping

(x1,…,xn)↦f(x1)f(x2)…f(xn) (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto f(x_1)f(x_2)\ldots f(x_n)
of MnM^n into EE is AA-multilinear; hence there corresponds to it an AA-linear mapping gn:Tn(M)→Eg_n : T^n(M) \to E such that
g(x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xn)=f(x1)f(x2)…f(xn). g(x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_n) = f(x_1)f(x_2)\ldots f(x_n).
Also we define the mapping g0:T0(M)→Eg_0 : T^0(M) \to E as equal to ηE\eta_E (§1§ 1, no. 3), in other words g0(α)=αeg_0(\alpha) = \alpha e for α∈A\alpha \in A. Let gg be the unique AA-linear mapping of T(M)T(M) into EE whose restriction to Tn(M)T^n(M) is gng_n (n≥0n \geq 0); it is immediate that g∘ϕ=g1=fg \circ \phi = g_1 = f and it remains to verify that gg is an AA-algebra homomorphism. By construction g(1)=eg(1) = e and it suffices by linearity to show that g(uv)=g(u)g(v)g(uv) = g(u)g(v) for u∈Tp(M)u \in T^p(M) and v∈Tq(M)v \in T^q(M) (p>0,q>0p > 0, q > 0); now it follows from formulae (1) and (2) that this relation is true when u=x1⊗x2⊗⋯⊗xpu = x_1 \otimes x_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes x_p and v∈xp+1⊗⋯⊗xp+qv \in x_{p+1} \otimes \cdots \otimes x_{p+q} (where the xix_i belong to EE). It is therefore true for u∈Tp(M)u \in T^p(M) and v∈Tq(M)v \in T^q(M) by linearity.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.