Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 062K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 062K].

Algebra, chapter III, § 6. Symmetric algebras

Let AA be a commutative ring and MM a free AA-*module with basis* (eλ)λ∈L(e_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}. For every mapping α:L→N\alpha : L \to \mathbf{N} of finite support, we write

eα=∏λ∈Leλα(λ) e^\alpha = \prod_{\lambda \in L} e_\lambda^{\alpha(\lambda)}

(product in the commutative algebra S(M)S(M)). Then, when α\alpha runs through the set N(L)\mathbf{N}^{(L)} of mappings of LL into N\mathbf{N}, of finite support, the eαe^\alpha form a basis of the AA-*module* S(M)S(M).

As MM is the direct sum of the Mλ=AeλM_\lambda = Ae_\lambda, it suffices to prove the theorem when LL is reduced to a single element and then apply Proposition 9. But when M=AeM = Ae (e a free element), then x⊗y−y⊗x=0x \otimes y - y \otimes x = 0 for all x,yx, y in MM; the ideal g′\mathfrak{g}' is therefore zero, whence T(Ae)=S(Ae)T(Ae) = S(Ae) and the theorem then follows from § 5, no. 5, Theorem 1.

The multiplication table of the basis (14) is given by

(15)

eαeβ=eα+β e^\alpha e^\beta = e^{\alpha + \beta}
where α+β\alpha + \beta is the mapping λ↦α(λ)+β(λ)\lambda \mapsto \alpha(\lambda) + \beta(\lambda) of LL into N\mathbf{N}. In other words, the basis (eα)(e^\alpha) of S(M)S(M), with the multiplicative law (15), is canonically isomorphic to the free commutative monoid N(L)N^{(L)} derived from LL; it follows (§ 2, no. 9) that the symmetric algebra S(M)S(M) of a free module MM with basis whose indexing set is LL, is canonically isomorphic to the polynomial algebra A[(Xλ)λ∈L]A[(X_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}], the canonical isomorphism being obtained by mapping eλe_\lambda to XλX_\lambda. In particular (§ 2, no. 7, Proposition 7), for every mapping f:L→Ef : L \to E of LL into a commutative AA-algebra EE, there exists one and only one AA-algebra homomorphism f~:S(M)→E\tilde{f} : S(M) \to E such that f~(eλ)=f(λ)\tilde{f}(e_\lambda) = f(\lambda).

Remark (2). The above results can equally well be obtained as a consequence of the universal properties of polynomial algebras and symmetric algebras, taking account of II, § 1, no. 11, Corollary 3 to Proposition 17.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.