Let A be a commutative ring and M a free A-*module with basis* (eλ)λ∈L. For every mapping α:L→N of finite support, we write
eα=λ∈L∏eλα(λ)
(product in the commutative algebra S(M)). Then, when α runs through the set N(L) of mappings of L into N, of finite support, the eα form a basis of the A-*module* S(M).
As M is the direct sum of the Mλ=Aeλ, it suffices to prove the theorem when L is reduced to a single element and then apply Proposition 9. But when M=Ae (e a free element), then x⊗y−y⊗x=0 for all x,y in M; the ideal g′ is therefore zero, whence T(Ae)=S(Ae) and the theorem then follows from § 5, no. 5, Theorem 1.
The multiplication table of the basis (14) is given by
(15)
eαeβ=eα+β where
α+β is the mapping
λ↦α(λ)+β(λ) of
L into
N. In other words, the basis
(eα) of
S(M), with the multiplicative law (15), is canonically isomorphic to the free commutative monoid
N(L) derived from
L; it follows (§ 2, no. 9) that the symmetric algebra
S(M) of a free module
M with basis whose indexing set is
L, is canonically isomorphic to the polynomial algebra
A[(Xλ)λ∈L], the canonical isomorphism being obtained by mapping
eλ to
Xλ. In particular (§ 2, no. 7, Proposition 7), for every mapping
f:L→E of
L into a commutative
A-algebra
E, there exists one and only one
A-algebra homomorphism
f~:S(M)→E such that
f~(eλ)=f(λ).
Remark (2). The above results can equally well be obtained as a consequence of the universal properties of polynomial algebras and symmetric algebras, taking account of II, § 1, no. 11, Corollary 3 to Proposition 17.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.