Let f:Mn−1→A be an alternating (n−1)*-linear form*. If (xi)1≤i≤n is a sequence of n elements of M such that x1∧x2∧⋯∧xn=0, then
i=1∑n(−1)if(x1,…,x^i,…,xn)⋅xi=0 (where we write f(x1,…,x^i,…,xn)=f(x1,…,xi−1,xi+1,…,xn) for 1≤i≤n.
It suffices to prove that the n-linear mapping
(x1,…,xn)↦i=1∑n(−1)if(x1,…,x^i,…,xn)⋅xi of
Mn to
M is
alternating. Now, if
xi=xi+1, all the terms in the sum on the right hand side have zero coefficients except
xi and
xi+1, since
f is alternating; on the other hand, the coefficient of
xi is
(−1)if(x1,…,xi−1,xi+1,xi+2,…,xn)
and that of xi+1 is (−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi,xi+2,…,xn) and they are inverses by hypothesis.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.