Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 064M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 064M].

Algebra, chapter III, § 8. Determinants

Let MM be a free AA-module of finite dimension nn; for every endomorphism uu of MM and every ordered pair of elements ξ,η\xi, \eta of AA,

det⁡(ξ1M+ηu)=∑k≥0Tr⁡(∧k(u))ξn−kηk. \det(\xi 1_M + \eta u) = \sum_{k \geq 0} \operatorname{Tr}(\wedge^k(u)) \xi^{n-k} \eta^k.

Let (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} be a basis of MM and let I={1,n}I = \{1, n\}; to calculate the left hand side of (18), we must form the product

(ξe1+ηu(e1))∧(ξe2+ηu(e2))∧⋯∧(ξen+ηu(en)) (\xi e_1 + \eta u(e_1)) \wedge (\xi e_2 + \eta u(e_2)) \wedge \cdots \wedge (\xi e_n + \eta u(e_n))

which is equal to the sum of the terms ξn−pηpzK\xi^{n-p} \eta^p z_K, where

zK=x1∧x2∧⋯∧xn z_K = x_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_n

with xi=u(ei)x_i = u(e_i) for i∈Ki \in K, xi=eix_i = e_i for i∈H=I−Ki \in H = I - K, where the integer pp runs through the interval [0,n][0, n] and, for each pp, KK runs through the set of subsets of I with pp elements. If i1<i2<⋯<in−pi_1 < i_2 < \cdots < i_{n-p} (resp. j1<j2<⋯<jpj_1 < j_2 < \cdots < j_p) are the elements of H (resp. K) arranged in increasing order, we can write (§7§ 7, no. 8, Corollary 1 to Theorem 1 and formula (19))

zK=ρH,Kei1∧ei2∧⋯∧ein−p∧u(ej1)∧⋯∧u(ejp). z_K = \rho_{H, K} e_{i_1} \wedge e_{i_2} \wedge \cdots \wedge e_{i_{n-p}} \wedge u(e_{j_1}) \wedge \cdots \wedge u(e_{j_p}).

But if XX is the matrix of uu with respect to the basis (ei)(e_i), then by Proposition 10

u(ej1)∧⋯∧u(ejp)=∑L∈Fp(I)(det⁡XL,K)eL u(e_{j_1}) \wedge \cdots \wedge u(e_{j_p}) = \sum_{L \in \mathfrak{F}_p(I)} (\det X_{L, K}) e_L

and hence

zK=ρH,K∑L∈Fp(I)(det⁡XL,K)eH∧eL. z_K = \rho_{H, K} \sum_{L \in \mathfrak{F}_p(I)} (\det X_{L, K}) e_H \wedge e_L.

Now H∩L≠∅H \cap L \neq \varnothing except for L=KL = K; it therefore follows from §7§ 7, no. 8, formula (20) that zK=(det⁡XK,K)e1∧e2∧⋯∧enz_K = (\det X_{K, K}) e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n and formula (18) then follows from Proposition 10 and the definition of the trace of a matrix (II, §10§ 10, no. 11, formulae (49) and (50)).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.