Let M be a free A-module of finite dimension n; for every endomorphism u of M and every ordered pair of elements ξ,η of A,
det(ξ1M+ηu)=k≥0∑Tr(∧k(u))ξn−kηk.
Let (ei)1≤i≤n be a basis of M and let I={1,n}; to calculate the left hand side of (18), we must form the product
(ξe1+ηu(e1))∧(ξe2+ηu(e2))∧⋯∧(ξen+ηu(en))
which is equal to the sum of the terms ξn−pηpzK, where
zK=x1∧x2∧⋯∧xn
with xi=u(ei) for i∈K, xi=ei for i∈H=I−K, where the integer p runs through the interval [0,n] and, for each p, K runs through the set of subsets of I with p elements. If i1<i2<⋯<in−p (resp. j1<j2<⋯<jp) are the elements of H (resp. K) arranged in increasing order, we can write (§7, no. 8, Corollary 1 to Theorem 1 and formula (19))
zK=ρH,Kei1∧ei2∧⋯∧ein−p∧u(ej1)∧⋯∧u(ejp).
But if X is the matrix of u with respect to the basis (ei), then by Proposition 10
u(ej1)∧⋯∧u(ejp)=L∈Fp(I)∑(detXL,K)eL
and hence
zK=ρH,KL∈Fp(I)∑(detXL,K)eH∧eL.
Now H∩L=∅ except for L=K; it therefore follows from §7, no. 8, formula (20) that zK=(detXK,K)e1∧e2∧⋯∧en and formula (18) then follows from Proposition 10 and the definition of the trace of a matrix (II, §10, no. 11, formulae (49) and (50)).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.