*Let A be a K-algebra and m a two-sided ideal of A. Suppose that A0=A/m is a free K-module of finite dimension n, that there exists an integer r>0 such that mr={0} and that mi−1/mi is a free A0-module of finite dimension si for 1≤i≤r. Let s=s1+⋯+sr and for all a∈A let a0 denote the class of a mod. m. Then A is a free K-module of dimension ns and, for all a∈A,
TrA(a)=s⋅TrA0(a0),NA(a)=(NA0(a0))s
PcA(a;X)=(PcA0(a0;X))s.
By virtue of II, § 1, no. 13, Proposition 25, mi−1/mi is a free K-module of dimension nsi. Hence Proposition 1 of no. 2 can be applied with Pi=mi−1/mi;
this shows in the first place that A is a free K-module of dimension n(s1+⋯+sr)=ns. Moreover, the hypothesis implies that the A-module Pi is isomorphic to a direct sum of si submodules isomorphic to the A-module A0; by Proposition 1 of no. 2, therefore NPi(a)=NA0(a)si; finally therefore
NA(a)=NA0(a)s. In this formula
NA0(a) is defined by considering
A0 as a left
A-module and it is equal to the determinant of the
K-linear mapping
x↦ax of
A0 into itself; but, as
ax=a0x for
x∈A0,
NA0(a)=NA0(a0), which completes the proof of formula (23) for the norm. The two others are shown analogously.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.