Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 065Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 065Z].

Algebra, chapter III, § 9. Norms and traces

*Let A be a K-algebra and m a two-sided ideal of A. Suppose that A0=A/mA_0 = A/m is a free K-module of finite dimension n, that there exists an integer r>0r > 0 such that mr={0}m^r = \{0\} and that mi−1/mim^{i-1}/m^i is a free A0A_0-module of finite dimension sis_i for 1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r. Let s=s1+⋯+srs = s_1 + \cdots + s_r and for all a∈Aa \in A let a0a_0 denote the class of aa mod. m. Then A is a free K-module of dimension nsns and, for all a∈Aa \in A,

TrA(a)=s⋅TrA0(a0),NA(a)=(NA0(a0))s \mathrm{Tr}_A(a) = s \cdot \mathrm{Tr}_{A_0}(a_0), \qquad N_A(a) = (N_{A_0}(a_0))^s
PcA(a;X)=(PcA0(a0;X))s. \mathrm{Pc}_A(a; X) = (\mathrm{Pc}_{A_0}(a_0; X))^s.

By virtue of II, § 1, no. 13, Proposition 25, mi−1/mim^{i-1}/m^i is a free K-module of dimension nsins_i. Hence Proposition 1 of no. 2 can be applied with Pi=mi−1/miP_i = m^{i-1}/m^i;

this shows in the first place that AA is a free KK-module of dimension n(s1+⋯+sr)=nsn(s_1 + \cdots + s_r) = ns. Moreover, the hypothesis implies that the AA-module PiP_i is isomorphic to a direct sum of sis_i submodules isomorphic to the AA-module A0A_0; by Proposition 1 of no. 2, therefore NPi(a)=NA0(a)siN_{P_i}(a) = N_{A_0}(a)^{s_i}; finally therefore

NA(a)=NA0(a)s. N_A(a) = N_{A_0}(a)^s.
In this formula NA0(a)N_{A_0}(a) is defined by considering A0A_0 as a left AA-module and it is equal to the determinant of the KK-linear mapping x↦axx \mapsto ax of A0A_0 into itself; but, as ax=a0xax = a_0x for x∈A0x \in A_0, NA0(a)=NA0(a0)N_{A_0}(a) = N_{A_0}(a_0), which completes the proof of formula (23) for the norm. The two others are shown analogously.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.