Remark
Tag 0668, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0668].
Algebra, chapter III, § 10. Derivations
(1) The notion of derivation can be defined for non-graded modules by agreeing to give these modules the trivial graduation.
(2) If only -derivations of given degree are considered, the commutation factor may be disposed of as follows: the bilinear mapping is modified by replacing it by the bilinear mapping such that, for every homogeneous in and all ,
The general definition of -derivations given above is especially used in two cases:
Case (I): and the three bilinear mappings are equal to the same mapping.
Case (II): , so that (for ) is a graded algebra and the two K-bilinear mappings.
Consider in particular in case (II) the case where A is a unital associative K-algebra and and are the external laws of an (A, A)-bimodule (§ 4, no. 3, Definition 3). This holds notably when A and B are two unital associative K-algebras, a unital homomorphism of graded K-algebras is given and an (A, A)-bimodule structure is considered on B defined by the two external laws
for .
Cases (I) and (II) have the following case in common: consider a graded K-algebra A, take , mappings (7) both being multiplication on A. We then speak of an -derivation (or (K, )-derivation) of the graded algebra A: it is a graded K-linear mapping of A into itself, of degree , satisfying (8) for every homogeneous in A and all . In particular if A is a graded ring, considered as an (associative) -algebra, we speak of the -derivation of the ring A.
Let A be a unital commutative associative K-algebra and B an A-module; when we speak of a derivation of A into B, it will always be understood that we mean with the A-bimodule structure on B derived from its A-module structure; then the formula
holds for such a derivation .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.