Bourbaki

Example 5

Tag 066D, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 066D].

Algebra, chapter III, § 10. Derivations

Returning to the general situation of Definition 1 of no. 2, let K‾\overline{K} be another commutative ring and ρ:K→K‾\rho : K \to \overline{K} a ring homomorphism; let A‾,A‾′,A‾′′,B‾,B‾′,B‾′′\overline{A}, \overline{A}', \overline{A}'', \overline{B}, \overline{B}', \overline{B}'' denote the graded K‾\overline{K}-modules obtained respectively from A,A′,A′′,B,B′,B′′A, A', A'', B, B', B'' by extending the ring of scalars to K‾\overline{K} (II, § 11, no. 5); we derive from μ,λ1\mu, \lambda_1 and λ2\lambda_2 K‾\overline{K}-bilinear mappings

μˉ:A‾×A‾′→A‾′′,λˉ1:B‾×A‾′→B‾′′,λˉ2:A‾×B‾′→B‾′′ \bar{\mu} : \overline{A} \times \overline{A}' \to \overline{A}'', \quad \bar{\lambda}_1 : \overline{B} \times \overline{A}' \to \overline{B}'', \quad \bar{\lambda}_2 : \overline{A} \times \overline{B}' \to \overline{B}''
by considering the tensor products by lK‾l_{\overline{K}} of the corresponding KK-linear mappings to μ,λ1\mu, \lambda_1 and λ2\lambda_2 (II, § 5, no. 1). Then, if dd is an ε\varepsilon-derivation of degree δ\delta of (A,A′,A′′)(A, A', A'') into (B,B′,B′′)(B, B', B''), the mapping dˉ=d⊗lK‾\bar{d} = d \otimes l_{\overline{K}} of A‾⊕A‾′⊕A‾′′\overline{A} \oplus \overline{A}' \oplus \overline{A}'' into B‾⊕B‾′⊕B‾′′\overline{B} \oplus \overline{B}' \oplus \overline{B}'' is an ε\varepsilon-derivation of degree δ\delta of (A‾,A‾′,A‾′′)(\overline{A}, \overline{A}', \overline{A}'') into (B‾,B‾′,B‾′′)(\overline{B}, \overline{B}', \overline{B}'').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.