Returning to the general situation of Definition 1 of no. 2, let K be another commutative ring and ρ:K→K a ring homomorphism; let A,A′,A′′,B,B′,B′′ denote the graded K-modules obtained respectively from A,A′,A′′,B,B′,B′′ by extending the ring of scalars to K (II, § 11, no. 5); we derive from μ,λ1 and λ2 K-bilinear mappings
μˉ:A×A′→A′′,λˉ1:B×A′→B′′,λˉ2:A×B′→B′′ by considering the tensor products by
lK of the corresponding
K-linear mappings to
μ,λ1 and
λ2 (II, § 5, no. 1). Then, if
d is an
ε-derivation of degree
δ of
(A,A′,A′′) into
(B,B′,B′′), the mapping
dˉ=d⊗lK of
A⊕A′⊕A′′ into
B⊕B′⊕B′′ is an
ε-derivation of degree
δ of
(A,A′,A′′) into
(B,B′,B′′).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.