Bourbaki

Example

Tag 0676, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0676].

Algebra, chapter III, § 10. Derivations

Let M be a K-module; it follows from Proposition 14 of no. 9 that for every S(M)-module E, the mapping D ↦ D | M defines an S(M)-module isomorphism of D_K(S(M), E) onto Hom_K(M, E); on the other hand, since E is an S(M)-module, Hom_K(M, E) is canonically isomorphic to

Hom⁡S(M)(M⊗KS(M),E), \operatorname{Hom}_{S(M)}(M \otimes_K S(M), E),

every K-homomorphism of M into E being uniquely expressible in the form x↦h(x⊗1)x \mapsto h(x \otimes 1), where

h∈Hom⁡S(M)(M⊗KS(M),E) h \in \operatorname{Hom}_{S(M)}(M \otimes_K S(M), E)

(II, § 5, no. 1). Let D_0 be the K-derivation S(M)→M⊗KS(M)S(M) \to M \otimes_K S(M) whose restriction to M is the canonical homomorphism x↦x⊗1x \mapsto x \otimes 1; every K-derivation D : S(M) → E can therefore be written uniquely as h∘D0h \circ D_0 with

h∈Hom⁡S(M)(M⊗KS(M),E). h \in \operatorname{Hom}_{S(M)}(M \otimes_K S(M), E).

By the uniqueness of a solution of a universal mapping problem, it is seen that there exists a unique S(M)-module isomorphism

ω:M⊗KS(M)→ΩK(S(M)) \omega : M \otimes_K S(M) \to \Omega_K(S(M))

such that D0∘ω=dS(M)/KD_0 \circ \omega = d_{S(M)/K}; in other words, for all x∈Mx \in M, ω(x⊗1)=dx\omega(x \otimes 1) = dx.

In particular, if M is a free K-module with basis (eλ)λ∈L(e_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}, ΩK(S(M))\Omega_K(S(M)) is a free S(M)-module with basis the set of differentials deλde_\lambda. Consider in particular the case where L={1,n}L = \{1, n\}, so that S(M) is identified with the polynomial algebra K[X1,…,Xn]K[X_1, \ldots, X_n] (§ 6, no. 6); for every polynomial P∈K[X1,…,Xn]P \in K[X_1, \ldots, X_n], we can write uniquely

dP=∑i=1nDiP.dXi dP = \sum_{i=1}^n D_i P . dX_i

with DiP∈K[X1,…,Xn]D_i P \in K[X_1, \ldots, X_n] and, by virtue of the above, the mappings P↦DiPP \mapsto D_i P are the K-derivations of K[X1,…,Xn]K[X_1, \ldots, X_n] corresponding to the coordinate forms on ΩK(S(M))\Omega_K(S(M)) for the basis (dXi)(dX_i); we also write ∂P∂Xi\frac{\partial P}{\partial X_i} instead of DiPD_i P and this is called the partial derivative of P with respect to XiX_i.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.