Example
Tag 0676, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0676].
Algebra, chapter III, § 10. Derivations
Let M be a K-module; it follows from Proposition 14 of no. 9 that for every S(M)-module E, the mapping D ↦ D | M defines an S(M)-module isomorphism of D_K(S(M), E) onto Hom_K(M, E); on the other hand, since E is an S(M)-module, Hom_K(M, E) is canonically isomorphic to
every K-homomorphism of M into E being uniquely expressible in the form , where
(II, § 5, no. 1). Let D_0 be the K-derivation whose restriction to M is the canonical homomorphism ; every K-derivation D : S(M) → E can therefore be written uniquely as with
By the uniqueness of a solution of a universal mapping problem, it is seen that there exists a unique S(M)-module isomorphism
such that ; in other words, for all , .
In particular, if M is a free K-module with basis , is a free S(M)-module with basis the set of differentials . Consider in particular the case where , so that S(M) is identified with the polynomial algebra (§ 6, no. 6); for every polynomial , we can write uniquely
with and, by virtue of the above, the mappings are the K-derivations of corresponding to the coordinate forms on for the basis ; we also write instead of and this is called the partial derivative of P with respect to .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.