Lemma 5
Tag 069F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 069F].
Algebra, chapter III, Appendix 0. Alternative algebras. Octonions
Suppose that the mapping is alternating and let be two strongly associative subalgebras of . Then the subalgebra of generated by is associative.
Let be the set of such that for all and , this is obviously a sub-A-module containing and since and are strongly associative; by Lemma 2, it will suffice to verify that, for and , and . Now, for in , and , by (2)
by virtue of the fact that is strongly associative and the definition of . But as is strongly associative, and since , by definition of . Hence , which shows that . Applying (2) now with , we obtain similarly . Interchanging the roles of and and using the fact that is alternating, we obtain and ; whence the lemma.
It now suffices, to prove that (b) implies (a) in Proposition 1, to take and , using Lemma 4.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.