Let F be an octonion algebra of type (−1,0,−1,−1) over A. There exists a vector space V of dimension 3 over the field with two elements Z/2Z and a bijection λ↦eλ′ of V onto the basis (ei)0≤i≤7 such that
e0′=e0,eλ′eμ′=±eλ+μ′ for all λ,μ in V. In order that eλ′(eμ′eν′)=(eλ′eμ)eν′, it suffices that, in V, λ,μ,ν be linearly dependent over Z/2Z; this condition is necessary if 2=0 in A.
We preserve the notation at the beginning of this no. It follows from formulae (33) of § 2, no. 5 that the set S consisting of the elements ±e0,±e1,±e2,±e3 is stable under multiplication. Moreover, for x,y,y′ in E, by formula (22) of § 2, no. 5,
(x,0)(0,y′)=(0,y′x),(0,y′)(x,0)=(0,y′x),(0,y)(0,y′)=(−y′y,0) so that the set
T consisting of the elements
±ei (
0≤i≤7) is stable under multiplication; moreover, its multiplication table is
independent of the ring
A.
In particular, let A′′ be the field Z/2Z with two elements and let E′′ be the quaternion algebra of type (1,0,1) over A′′ and F′′ the algebra of octonions of type (1,0,1,1) over A′′; let (ei′′)0≤i≤7 be the basis of F′′ formed as described above. Since −ei′′=ei′′, the set T′′ of ei′′ has 8 elements and is stable under multiplication; moreover, it follows immediately from the above that the mapping θ:T→T′′ such that θ(ei)=θ(−ei)=ei′′ for 0≤i≤7 is a homomorphism for multiplication. Moreover the quaternion algebra E′′ is in this case commutative and hence F′′ is associative (§ 2, no. 5, Proposition 5); further, conjugation in F′′ is in this case the identity. Hence T′′ is a group and formulae (8) show that it is commutative; these formulae and formulae (33) of § 2, no. 5 show that the square of every element of T′′ is the unit. If V is used to denote the group T′′ written additively, V can be given a unique vector space structure over Z/2Z, necessarily of dimension 3 since
Card(V)=8=2dim(V).
For all λ∈V, let eλ′ then denote the element of (ei)0≤i≤7 such that θ(eλ′)=λ; then e0′=e0; moreover, as θ is a homomorphism and the relation θ(x)=θ(y) is equivalent to x=±y, eλ′eμ′=±eλ+μ′. If λ,μ,ν are linearly independent over Z/2Z, they form a basis of V and hence all the elements ei (0≤i≤7) would belong to the subalgebra generated by eλ′,eμ′ and eν′; when 2=0 in A, eλ′(eμ′eν′)=(eλ′eμ′)eν′ is therefore impossible, for F would be associative and hence E would be commutative (§ 2, no. 5, Proposition 5), which contradicts relations (33) of § 2, no. 5. On the other hand, if λ,μ,ν are linearly dependent in V, the three elements eλ′,eμ′,ev′ belong to a subalgebra with 2 generators of F, which is therefore associative (no. 1, Proposition 1); whence the conclusion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.