Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 06BQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06BQ].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 3. Rational fractions

— *Let EE be an associative, commutative and unital KK-algebra, x=(xi)i,Ix = (x_i)_{i, I} a family of elements of EE and f∈K((Xi)i,I)f \in K((X_i)_{i, I}). Suppose that xx is substitutable in ff and y=f(x)y = f(x). (i) For every derivation AA of K((Xi)i,I)K((X_i)_{i, I}) which maps K[(Xi)i,I]K[(X_i)_{i, I}] into itself, xx is substitutable in AfAf. (ii) For every derivation DD of EE into an EE-module we have

Dy=∑i∈I(Dif)(x)⋅Dxi. Dy = \sum_{i \in I} (D_i f)(x) \cdot Dx_i .

Let f=uvf = \frac{u}{v} with u,v∈K[(Xi)i∈I]u, v \in K[(X_i)_{i \in I}] and v(x)v(x) invertible in E. Let A be a derivation of K((Xi)i∈I)K((X_i)_{i \in I}) mapping K[(Xi)i∈I]K[(X_i)_{i \in I}] into itself. We have

Δf=(Δu) v−u(Δv)v2 \Delta f = \frac{(\Delta u)\ v - u(\Delta v)}{v^2}
and v2(x)v^2(x) is invertible, hence x is substitutable in AfAf. Secondly put r=u(x)r = u(x), s=v(x)s = v(x); we have y=s−1ry = s^{-1}r, hence for every derivation D of E into an E-module we have
Dy=s−2(s(Dr)−r(Ds))=s−2(s∑i∈I(Diu)(x)⋅Dxi−r∑i∈I(Div)(x)⋅Dxi) \begin{align*} Dy &= s^{-2}(s(Dr) - r(Ds)) \\ &= s^{-2}\left( s \sum_{i \in I} (D_iu)(x) \cdot Dx_i - r \sum_{i \in I} (D_iv)(x) \cdot Dx_i \right) \end{align*}
by Prop. 4 of IV, p. 6. Thus Dy=∑i∈Iwi⋅DxiDy = \sum_{i \in I} w_i \cdot Dx_i with
wi=v(x)−2(v(x)(Diu)(x)−u(x)(Div)(x))=(Dif)(x). w_i = v(x)^{-2}(v(x)(D_iu)(x) - u(x)(D_iv)(x)) = (D_if)(x).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.