— *Let E be an associative, commutative and unital K-algebra, x=(xi)i,I a family of elements of E and f∈K((Xi)i,I). Suppose that x is substitutable in f and y=f(x). (i) For every derivation A of K((Xi)i,I) which maps K[(Xi)i,I] into itself, x is substitutable in Af. (ii) For every derivation D of E into an E-module we have
Dy=i∈I∑(Dif)(x)⋅Dxi.
Let f=vu with u,v∈K[(Xi)i∈I] and v(x) invertible in E. Let A be a derivation of K((Xi)i∈I) mapping K[(Xi)i∈I] into itself. We have
Δf=v2(Δu) v−u(Δv) and
v2(x) is invertible, hence x is substitutable in
Af. Secondly put
r=u(x),
s=v(x); we have
y=s−1r, hence for every derivation D of E into an E-module we have
Dy=s−2(s(Dr)−r(Ds))=s−2(si∈I∑(Diu)(x)⋅Dxi−ri∈I∑(Div)(x)⋅Dxi) by Prop. 4 of IV, p. 6. Thus
Dy=∑i∈Iwi⋅Dxi with
wi=v(x)−2(v(x)(Diu)(x)−u(x)(Div)(x))=(Dif)(x).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.