— (i) Let m∈MG and h∈H. Then hm∈MhGh−1 and
TrH/hGh−1(hm)=TrH/Gm.
(ii) Let F be a subgroup of G of finite index in G, and let m∈MF, then
TrH/G(TrG/Fm)=TrH/Fm
(iii) If m∈MH, then TrH/Gm=(H:G)⋅m.
(i) Let h∈H. For h′∈H and m∈M let us put φ(h′)=hh′h−1 and ψ(m)=hm. We have φ(h′)ψ(m)=ψ(h′m); by transfer of structure we deduce that if m∈MG, then hm∈MhGh−1 and
TrH/hGh−1(hm)=ψ(TrH/G(m)).
Since TrH/G(m)∈MH, this proves (i).
(ii) Let m∈MF and let (gα)α∈A be a system of representatives of the left cosets of G mod F, and (hβ)β∈B a system of representatives of the left cosets of H mod G. Then (hβgα)(β,α)∈B×A is a system of representatives of the left cosets of H mod F. so
TrH/G(TrG/Fm)=β∈B∑hβ(α∈A∑gαm)=(β,α)∈B×A∑(hβgα)m=TrH/Fm.
(iii) This assertion is evident.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.