Suppose that f is monic of degree > 0 and K is of characteristic ≠ 2. Define on A a total ordering, denoted by ≤, and put δ(f) = ∏α<β(β−a), (α,β)∈A×A, and for each σ∈SA put δσ(f)=∏α<β(σ(β)−σ(α)). We have δσ(f)=ε(u)δ(f), where ε(u) is the signature of σ (I, p. 64) and δ(f)=0. For every τ∈Gal(N/K) we have τ(δ(f))=δτ∣A(f). Hence Γ is contained in the alternating group AA if and only if δ(f)∈K. Moreover δ(f)2=∏α<β(β−a)′=d(f) is the discriminant of the polynomial f (IV, p. 81). Hence Γ⊂AA if and only if d(f) is the square of an element of K. Thus in Example 2 we have d(f)=49=72 and in Example 3, d(f)=−108 (IV, p. 85).
Let N be a Galois extension of K and let L be a subextension of N which is Galois over K. Every K-automorphism σ of N induces a K-automorphism σL of L (V, p. 55, Remark 1). Therefore the mapping σ↦σL is a homomorphism of Gal(N/K) into Gal(L/K), called the restriction homomorphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.