— Let (xi)1≤i≤p and (yj)1≤j≤q be two finite sequences of positive elements of a lattice ordered group G such that
i=1∑pxi=j=1∑qyj; then there exists a double sequence (zij)1≤i≤p,1≤j≤q of positive elements of G such that xi=∑j=1qzij for all i,
and yj=∑i=1pzij for all j.
1) Let us prove the theorem first for the case p=q=2. Let x,x′,y,y′ be positive elements of G such that x+x′=y+y′, and put a=sup(0,x−y′). Since
x−y′=y−x′ is less than
x and less than
y, it follows that
b=x−a and
c=y−a are positive, as is
d=a−(x−y′). Also we have
x=a+b,x′=c+d,y=a+candy′=b+d.
2) Let us now show that if the theorem is true for p<m and q=n (m>2, n≥2) then it is true for p=m and q=n. By hypothesis we have x,+∑i=1m−1xi=∑j=1nyj. The theorem being true for p=2 and q=n, there exist two finite sequences (zj′),(zj′′) of n positive terms such that ∑i=1m−1xi=∑j=1nzj′, xm=∑j=1nzj′′, and yj=zj′+zj′′ for 1≤j≤n. On the other hand, since the theorem is true for p=m−1 and q=n, there exists a double sequence (uij)1≤i≤m−1,1≤j≤n such that xi=∑j=1nuij for 1≤i≤m−1, and zj′=∑i=1m−1uij for 1≤j≤n. Putting
zij=uijfor1≤i≤m−1,andzmj=zj′′(1≤j≤n), we certainly obtain a double sequence satisfying the conditions of the theorem.
3) By interchanging the xi and the yj we see in the same way that, if the theorem is true for p=m and q<n (m≥2, n>2), then it is true for p=m and q=n. The theorem is thus proved by double induction starting from the case p=q=2, for it is trivially true whenever p≤1 or q≤1.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.