Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (decomposition theorem)

Tag 06WZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06WZ].

Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Ordered groups. Divisibility

— Let (xi)1≤i≤p(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq p} and (yj)1≤j≤q(y_j)_{1 \leq j \leq q} be two finite sequences of positive elements of a lattice ordered group GG such that

∑i=1pxi=∑j=1qyj; \sum_{i=1}^p x_i = \sum_{j=1}^q y_j ;
then there exists a double sequence (zij)1≤i≤p,1≤j≤q(z_{ij})_{1 \leq i \leq p, 1 \leq j \leq q} of positive elements of GG such that xi=∑j=1qzijx_i = \sum_{j=1}^q z_{ij} for all ii, and yj=∑i=1pzijy_j = \sum_{i=1}^p z_{ij} for all jj.

1) Let us prove the theorem first for the case p=q=2p = q = 2. Let x,x′,y,y′x, x', y, y' be positive elements of GG such that x+x′=y+y′x + x' = y + y', and put a=sup⁡(0,x−y′)a = \sup(0, x - y'). Since

x−y′=y−x′ x - y' = y - x'
is less than xx and less than yy, it follows that b=x−ab = x - a and c=y−ac = y - a are positive, as is d=a−(x−y′)d = a - (x - y'). Also we have
x=a+b,x′=c+d,y=a+candy′=b+d. x = a + b, \quad x' = c + d, \quad y = a + c \quad \text{and} \quad y' = b + d .

2) Let us now show that if the theorem is true for p<mp < m and q=nq = n (m>2, n≥2m > 2,\ n \geq 2) then it is true for p=mp = m and q=nq = n. By hypothesis we have x,+∑i=1m−1xi=∑j=1nyjx, + \sum_{i=1}^{m-1} x_i = \sum_{j=1}^n y_j. The theorem being true for p=2p = 2 and q=nq = n, there exist two finite sequences (zj′),(zj′′)(z_j'), (z_j'') of nn positive terms such that ∑i=1m−1xi=∑j=1nzj′\sum_{i=1}^{m-1} x_i = \sum_{j=1}^n z_j', xm=∑j=1nzj′′x_m = \sum_{j=1}^n z_j'', and yj=zj′+zj′′y_j = z_j' + z_j'' for 1≤j≤n1 \leq j \leq n. On the other hand, since the theorem is true for p=m−1p = m - 1 and q=nq = n, there exists a double sequence (uij)1≤i≤m−1,1≤j≤n(u_{ij})_{1 \leq i \leq m-1, 1 \leq j \leq n} such that xi=∑j=1nuijx_i = \sum_{j=1}^n u_{ij} for 1≤i≤m−11 \leq i \leq m - 1, and zj′=∑i=1m−1uijz_j' = \sum_{i=1}^{m-1} u_{ij} for 1≤j≤n1 \leq j \leq n. Putting

zij=uijfor1≤i≤m−1,andzmj=zj′′(1≤j≤n), z_{ij} = u_{ij} \quad \text{for} \quad 1 \leq i \leq m - 1 , \quad \text{and} \quad z_{mj} = z_j'' \quad (1 \leq j \leq n) ,
we certainly obtain a double sequence satisfying the conditions of the theorem.

3) By interchanging the xix_i and the yjy_j we see in the same way that, if the theorem is true for p=mp = m and q<nq < n (m≥2, n>2m \geq 2,\ n > 2), then it is true for p=mp = m and q=nq = n. The theorem is thus proved by double induction starting from the case p=q=2p = q = 2, for it is trivially true whenever p≤1p \leq 1 or q≤1q \leq 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.