Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 06ZP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06ZP].

Algebra, chapter VI, § 2. Ordered fields

— Let K be a commutative field (of arbitrary characteristic) and let K′K' be a splitting field for the polynomial X2+1∈K[X]X^2 + 1 \in K[X] (V, p. 21). Suppose: a) every polynomial in K[X]K[X] of odd degree has a root in K′K';

b) every polynomial in K′[X]K'[X] of degree 2 has a root in K′K'. Then K′K' is algebraically closed.

Note first that it is enough to prove that every non-constant polynomial in K[X]K[X] has a root in K′K': this is indeed clear if K′=KK' = K; if K′≠KK' \neq K then [K′:K]=2[K':K] = 2; let a↦aa \mapsto a denote the unique KK-automorphism of K′K' distinct from the identity map; if f∈K′[X]f \in K'[X] and if fˉ\bar{f} denotes the polynomial obtained by applying a↦aˉa \mapsto \bar{a} to the coefficients of ff, then ffˉ∈K[X]f \bar{f} \in K[X]; if a∈K′a \in K' is a root of ffˉf \bar{f} then aa is either a root of ff or of fˉ\bar{f}; thus either aa or aa is a root of ff.

Thus let ff be a polynomial over KK of degree 2np2^n p, pp odd. We will proceed by induction on nn, the property being true for n=0n = 0 by hypothesis a). Let E be an extension of KK in which ff splits into linear factors:

f(X)=∏i(X−ai) f(X) = \prod_i (X - a_i)

Let b∈Kb \in K; put yij=ai+aj+baiaj∈Ey_{ij} = a_i + a_j + ba_i a_j \in E and

h(X)=∏i<j(X−yij)∈E[X]. h(X) = \prod_{i < j} (X - y_{ij}) \in E[X].

The coefficients of this polynomial are symmetric functions in the aia_i, with coefficients in KK; it therefore belongs to K[X]K[X] (IV, p. 62, Th. 1); since it has degree 2np(2np−1)/2=2n−1p′2^n p (2^n p - 1)/2 = 2^{n-1} p' (p′p' odd), it has a root yy_{}, in K′K' by inductive hypothesis. If we note that this holds for all b∈Kb \in K, and that KK is an infinite field (indeed a finite field, which has monogenous extensions of arbitrarily large odd degree (V, p. 94, Prop. 3), cannot satisfy a)), then we can deduce the existence of at least one pair (i,j)(i, j) such that

ai+aj+baiaj∈K′andai+aj+b′aiaj∈K′, a_i + a_j + ba_i a_j \in K' \quad \text{and} \quad a_i + a_j + b'a_i a_j \in K',

with b≠b′b \neq b'. Then ai+aja_i + a_j and aiaja_i a_j are elements of K′K', hence so are aia_i and aja_j, since they are the roots of the quadratic equation

x2−(ai+aj)x+aiaj=0. x^2 - (a_i + a_j)x + a_i a_j = 0.

Q.E.D.

For a generalisation and an alternative proof of Prop. 8, based on Galois theory, see VI, p. 46, Ex. 33.

Let KK be an ordered field and let K′=K(i)K' = K(i); for every element z=a+biz = a + bi of K′K', the norm zz‾=a2+b′z \overline{z} = a^2 + b' of zz relative to KK (III, p. 544, example 1) is a positive element of KK, which vanishes only for z=0z = 0. If every positive element in KK is a square (in particular if KK is a maximal ordered field), then the positive square root of the norm zz‾z \overline{z} is called the absolute value of zz, and is written ∣z∣|z|. Since ∣zz′∣2=∣z∣2∣z′∣2|zz'|^2 = |z|^2 |z'|^2 we have ∣zz′∣=∣z∣⋅∣z′∣|zz'| = |z| \cdot |z'|.

Moreover, the triangle inequality

∣z+z′∣≤∣z∣+∣z′∣ |z + z'| \leq |z| + |z'|

holds for every pair of elements z,z′z, z' of K′K'. Indeed, if z=a+biz = a + bi and z′=a′+b′iz' = a' + b'i, then this inequality is equivalent to

(a+a′)2+(b+b′)2≤a2+b2+a′2+b′2+2(a2+b2)(a′2+b′2) (a + a')^2 + (b + b')^2 \leq a^2 + b^2 + {a'}^2 + {b'}^2 + 2 \sqrt{(a^2 + b^2)({a'}^2 + {b'}^2)}

and hence also to

(aa′+bb′)2≤(a2+b2)(a′2+b′2) (aa' + bb')^2 \leq (a^2 + b^2)({a'}^2 + {b'}^2)

which can be written (ab′−ba′)2≥0(ab' - ba')^2 \geq 0.

Th. 3 enables us to determine all the irreducible polynomials over a maximal ordered field:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.