Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 074L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 074L].

Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain

— If M is an A-module of finite length, then D(M)D(M) is (in general non-naturally) isomorphic to M, and the canonical map cM:M→D(D(M))c_M : M \to D(D(M)) is an isomorphism. Using VII, p. 19, Th. 2 and II, p. 203, Cor. 1, we reduce to the case where MM is cyclic. Thus we may suppose that M=A/tAM = A/tA with t≠0t \neq 0. Note that any homomorphism u:A/tA→K/Au : A/tA \to K/A is completely determined by the image ξ∈K/A\xi \in K/A under uu of the class ε\varepsilon of 1 mod tAtA, and this element must satisfy the relation tξ=0t\xi = 0 ; conversely, for any ξ∈K/A\xi \in K/A such that tξ=0t\xi = 0, there exists a homomorphism u:A/tA→K/Au : A/tA \to K/A such that u(ε)=ξu(\varepsilon) = \xi. It follows that D(M)D(M) is isomorphic to t−1A/At^{-1}A/A, and since the homothety by tt is a bijection on K, we also have D(M)D(M) isomorphic to A/tAA/tA, which proves the first assertion. This proves that MM and D(D(M))D(D(M)) are isomorphic, so have the same length ; on the other hand cMc_M is injective, for if y∈Ay \in A is such that the relation tz∈Atz \in A (for z∈Kz \in K) implies yz∈Ayz \in A, then taking z=t−1z = t^{-1} we have y∈tAy \in tA. It follows that the image cM(M)c_M(M) is necessarily equal to D(D(M))D(D(M)).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.