Bourbaki

Proposition 22

Tag 07CH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07CH].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 20, § 2. Convex sets

Let A be a convex set, containing 0, in the vector space E. For all x∈Ex \in E, put

pA(x)=inf⁡ρ>0,x∈ρAρ p_A(x) = \inf_{\rho > 0, x \in \rho A} \rho
(0 ≤pA(x)≤∞\leq p_A(x) \leq \infty). The function pAp_A satisfies
pA(x+y)≤pA(x)+pA(y),pA(λx)=λpA(x) p_A(x + y) \leq p_A(x) + p_A(y), \qquad p_A(\lambda x) = \lambda p_A(x)
for all x,yx, y in E and λ>0\lambda > 0. If V(pA,α)V(p_A, \alpha) (resp. W(pA,α)W(p_A, \alpha)) denotes the set of x∈Ex \in E for which pA(x)≤αp_A(x) \leq \alpha (resp. pA(x)<αp_A(x) < \alpha), then
W(pA,1)⊂A⊂V(pA,1). W(p_A, 1) \subset A \subset V(p_A, 1).
If A is absorbent then pAp_A is finite (therefore sublinear).

Since the relations x∈ρAx \in \rho A and λx∈λρA\lambda x \in \lambda \rho A are equivalent when λ>0\lambda > 0, we have pA(λx)=λpA(x)p_A(\lambda x) = \lambda p_A(x) for λ>0\lambda > 0. Let x,yx, y be two points of E. If xx (resp. yy) is not absorbed by A then pA(x)=+∞p_A(x) = +\infty (resp. pA(y)=+∞p_A(y) = +\infty) and the inequality pA(x+y)≤pA(x)+pA(y)p_A(x + y) \leq p_A(x) + p_A(y) is obviously true. Suppose there exist α>0,β>0\alpha > 0, \beta > 0 such that x∈αAx \in \alpha A, and y∈βAy \in \beta A; then x+y∈αA+βA=(α+β)Ax + y \in \alpha A + \beta A = (\alpha + \beta) A (II, p. 8, Remark); and thus pA(x+y)≤pA(x)+pA(y)p_A(x + y) \leq p_A(x) + p_A(y). The inclusion A⊂V(pA,1)A \subset V(p_A, 1) is clearly true. The inclusion W(pA,1)⊂AW(p_A, 1) \subset A follows because A is convex and contains 0. Finally if A is absorbent then pAp_A is obviously finite.

The function pAp_A defined by (7) is called the gauge of the convex set A. If A is absorbent and symmetric, then pAp_A is a semi-norm.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.