Corollary 5
Tag 07V1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07V1].
Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 4. Strict morphisms of Fréchet spaces
— Let E and F be two Fréchet spaces and u a continuous linear mapping from E into F. The following conditions are equivalent : a) u is an isomorphism from E onto F. b) u is an isomorphism from E onto F for the weakened topologies. c) is an isomorphism from onto for the weak topologies. d) is an isomorphism from onto for the strong topologies. e) is an isomorphism from onto . Since an isomorphism is none other than a strict bijective morphism, the equivalence of a) and b) follows from the equivalence of conditions a) and b) of th. 1. It is clear that a) implies each of the conditions c), d) and e). Conversely, suppose that one of the conditions c), d) or e) is satisfied. It follows from th. 1 and its cor. 3 that u is a strict morphism from E into F, and is evidently bijective. Let N (resp. I) be the kernel (resp. the image) of u. Since is bijective, we have and , and so and by prop. 2 of IV, p. 27. But N (resp. I) is a closed vector subspace of E (resp. F), and the theorem of bipolars (II, p. 44) implies that and , hence u is bijective. We have therefore proved that u is an isomorphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.