Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 07V2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07V2].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, § 4. Strict morphisms of Fréchet spaces

— Let E and F be two Fréchet spaces, and u a continuous linear mapping from E into F. The following conditions are equivalent :

(i) u is surjective.

(ii) For every semi-norm p∈S(E)p \in S(E), there exists q∈S(F)q \in S(F) such that we have ∣f∣≤q|f| \leq q for every linear form f∈F′f \in F' satisfying ∣f∘u∣≤p|f \circ u| \leq p.

(iii) For every semi-norm p∈S(E)p \in S(E), there exists q∈S(F)q \in S(F) satisfying the following property : if a linear form f∈F′f \in F' satisfies ∣f∘u∣≤p|f \circ u| \leq p, then ff is null on points where qq is null and for all y∈Fy \in F, r∈S(F)r \in S(F), there exists x∈Ex \in E with r(u(x)−y)=0r(u(x) - y) = 0.

(iv) For every semi-norm p∈S(E)p \in S(E), we have

sup⁡f∈F∣f∘u∣≤p∣f(y)∣<+∞for ally∈F. \sup_{\substack{f \in F \\ |f \circ u| \leq p}} |f(y)| < +\infty \quad \text{for all} \quad y \in F .

We shall prove the proposition according to the following logical scheme

!Diagram showing the logical relationships between (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv)

If uu is surjective, it is a strict morphism (IV, p. 28, th. 1) then for every semi-norm p∈S(E)p \in S(E), there exists a semi-norm q∈S(F)q \in S(F) such that, for all y∈Fy \in F satisfying q(y)≤1q(y) \leq 1, there exists x∈Ex \in E satisfying p(x)≤1p(x) \leq 1 and u(x)=yu(x) = y. We deduce immediately that (i) implies (ii) and (iii). It is clear that (ii) implies (iv).

To prove that (iii) implies (iv), let pp and qq be as in (iii). Let y∈Fy \in F, by (iii), there exists xx in EE such that q(u(x)−y)=0q(u(x) - y) = 0. If f∈F′f \in F' satisfies ∣f∘u∣≤p|f \circ u| \leq p, then we have f(u(x)−y)=0f(u(x) - y) = 0, hence

∣f(y)∣=∣f(u(x))∣≤p(x) |f(y)| = |f(u(x))| \leq p(x)

and the relation (1) is satisfied.

Finally we prove that (iv) implies (i). Let p∈S(E)p \in S(E) and let qq be the superior envelope of the functions ∣f∣|f| for f∈F′f \in F' satisfying ∣f∘u∣≤p|f \circ u| \leq p. By (iv), qq is finite on FF, and is evidently a lower semi-continuous semi-norm on FF; since FF is barrelled (III, p. 25, corollary), we have q∈S(F)q \in S(F). Let BpB_p (resp. BqB_q) denote the set of all x∈Ex \in E (resp. y∈Fy \in F) such that p(x)≤1p(x) \leq 1 (resp. q(y)≤1q(y) \leq 1). We have q∘u≤pq \circ u \leq p, and so u(Bp)⊂Bqu(B_p) \subset B_q. The polar of u(Bp)u(B_p) in F′F' consists of linear forms f∈F′f \in F' such that ∣f∘u∣≤p|f \circ u| \leq p, hence ∣f∣≤q|f| \leq q; in other words, we get u(Bp)∘⊂Bq∘u(B_p)^{\circ} \subset B_q^{\circ}, and finally that u(Bp)‾=Bq\overline{u(B_p)} = B_q follows from the theorem of bipolars (II, p. 45, cor. 3). If UU is a neighbourhood of 0 in EE, there exists p∈S(E)p \in S(E) such that Bp⊂UB_p \subset U, hence u(U)‾\overline{u(U)} contains the neighbourhood BqB_q of 0 in FF. This implies that uu is surjective (I, p. 17, th. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.