Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 07VS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07VS].

Topological Vector Spaces, IV, p. 33, § 5. Compactness criteria

Let D be a dense subset of X and A a subset of the space Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). The following conditions are equivalent : (i) A is relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (ii) From every infinite sequence of elements of A, we can extract a sequence converging in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (iii) Every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (iv) Let (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a sequence of functions belonging to A and (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m \in \mathbf{N}} a sequence of points of D. If the iterated limits

γ=lim⁡m→∞lim⁡n→∞fn(xm),δ=lim⁡n→∞lim⁡m→∞fn(xm) \gamma = \lim_{m \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_m), \quad \delta = \lim_{n \to \infty} \lim_{m \to \infty} f_n(x_m)

exist, then they are equal. In addition, we have sup⁡f∈A∣f(x)∣<+∞\sup_{f \in A} |f(x)| < + \infty for all x∈Xx \in X.

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) : let A‾\overline{A} be the closure of A in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). Assume that A is compact, and consider a sequence of functions fn∈Af_n \in A (for n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}). Let ϕ\phi be the continuous mapping x↦(fn(x))n∈Nx \mapsto (f_n(x))_{n \in \mathbf{N}} from X into the metrizable space KNK^\mathbf{N}. The image X′X' of X under ϕ\phi is a compact metrizable space, since X is compact. Let E be the closed subspace of Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) consisting of continuous functions ff on X such that the relation ϕ(x)=ϕ(y)\phi(x) = \phi(y) implies f(x)=f(y)f(x) = f(y) for every pair of points x,yx, y in X. By cor. 2 of GT, I, § 9, No. 4 and prop. 3 of GT, I, § 5, No. 2, the mapping f′↦f′∘ϕf' \mapsto f' \circ \phi is a homeomorphism ϕ∗\phi^* from Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X') onto E. Hence the set A′=(ϕ∗)−1(A‾)A' = (\phi^*)^{-1}(\overline{A}) is compact in Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'), and it is clear that there exist elements fn′f'_n in A′A' such that ϕ∗(fn′)=fn′∘ϕ\phi^*(f'_n) = f'_n \circ \phi is equal to fnf_n.

Since X′X' is a compact metrizable space, there exists a countable dense subset D' in X′X' (GT, IX, § 2, No. 8, prop. 12 and § 2, No. 9, prop. 16). Let T1\mathscr{T}_1 (resp. T2\mathscr{T}_2) be the topology on A′A' induced by the topology of simple convergence on D' (resp. X′X'). Then T1\mathscr{T}_1 is metrizable, T2\mathscr{T}_2 is compact and finer than T1\mathscr{T}_1, hence T1\mathscr{T}_1 and T2\mathscr{T}_2 coincide; in other words, A′A' is a compact metrizable subspace of Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'). Therefore, there exists a sequence (fnk′)(f'_{n_k}) extracted from (fn′)(f'_n) and converging to an element f′f' of Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'). Therefore, the sequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) converges to f=f′∘ϕf = f' \circ \phi in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X).

(ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii) : this is clear.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iv) : suppose that every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). Let x∈Xx \in X. The mapping ϕx:f↦f(x)\phi_x : f \mapsto f(x) from A into K is continuous. Consequently, every infinite sequence in ϕx(A)\phi_x(A) has a limit point; since the field K (equal to R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}) is metrizable, the set ϕx(A)\phi_x(A) is relatively compact in K, hence bounded. In other words, we have sup⁡f∈A∣f(x)∣<∞\sup_{f \in A} |f(x)| < \infty.

Let fn,xm,γf_n, x_m, \gamma and δ\delta be as in (iv). Let ff be a limit point of the sequence (fn)(f_n) in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X), and let xx be a limit point of the sequence (xm)(x_m) in the compact space X. For every mm, the mapping h↦h(xm)h \mapsto h(x_m) from Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) into K is continuous. In view of the hypotheses, we have f(xm)=lim⁡n→∞fn(xm)f(x_m) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_m), and hence γ=lim⁡m→∞f(xm)\gamma = \lim_{m \to \infty} f(x_m); since f:X→Kf : X \to K is continuous and xx is a limit point of the sequence (xm)(x_m), we get γ=f(x)\gamma = f(x). In an analogous way, we prove the equality δ=f(x)\delta = f(x), whence γ=δ\gamma = \delta.

(iv) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) : suppose that the set of numbers f(x)f(x), as ff ranges over A, is bounded in K for all x∈Xx \in X. This is equivalent to assuming that the closure A‾\overline{A} of A in the product space KXK^X is compact (GT, I, § 9, No. 5). Suppose that A is not relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). This means that there exists a function u∈A‾u \in \overline{A} and a point a∈Xa \in X such that uu is not continuous at aa. Hence there exists a real number ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that in every neighbourhood U of aa, there exists a point xx with ∣u(x)−u(a)∣≥ε|u(x) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon.

We shall construct by induction a sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of points in D and a sequence (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of elements of A, satisfying the following relations :

(1)m_m

∣u(xm)−u(a)∣≥εform≥1; |u(x_m) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon \quad \text{for} \quad m \geq 1 ;

(2)m_m

∣u(xi)−fm(xi)∣≤1m+1for0≤i≤m−1; |u(x_i) - f_m(x_i)| \leq \frac{1}{m + 1} \quad \text{for} \quad 0 \leq i \leq m - 1 ;

(3)m,i_{m,i}

∣fm(xi)−fm(a)∣≤1i+1for0≤m≤i. |f_m(x_i) - f_m(a)| \leq \frac{1}{i + 1} \quad \text{for} \quad 0 \leq m \leq i .

We take x0=ax_0 = a with f0f_0 arbitrary in A (the set A is not empty, otherwise it will be relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X)). Let n≥1n \geq 1 and x0,x1,...,xn−1,f0,f1,...,fn−1x_0, x_1, ..., x_{n-1}, f_0, f_1, ..., f_{n-1} satisfy relations (1)m_m, (2)m_m for 1≤m<n1 \leq m < n and (3)m,i_{m,i} for 0≤m≤i<n0 \leq m \leq i < n. Since uu belongs to A‾\overline{A}, there exists fn∈Af_n \in A satisfying (2)n_n. Let VnV_n be the set of all x∈Xx \in X such that ∣fm(x)−fm(a)∣≤1n+1|f_m(x) - f_m(a)| \leq \frac{1}{n + 1} for 0≤m≤n0 \leq m \leq n. Since fnf_n is continuous, VnV_n is a neighbourhood of aa; choose a point xnx_n in D∩VnD \cap V_n such that ∣u(xn)−u(a)∣≥ε|u(x_n) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon, hence (1)n_n and (3)m,n_{m,n} are satisfied. Therefore, the construction can be continued.

Since u(X)u(X) is a compact subset of K, there exists a sequence (yk)(y_k) extracted from (xm)(x_m) and such that the limit γ=lim⁡k→∞u(yk)\gamma = \lim_{k \to \infty} u(y_k) exists. By (2)m_m, we have u(xi)=lim⁡n→∞fn(xi)u(x_i) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_i) for all i∈Ni \in \mathbf{N}, hence

(4)

γ=lim⁡k→∞lim⁡n→∞fn(yk). \gamma = \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(y_k) .

On the other hand we have fn(a)=lim⁡i→∞fn(xi)f_n(a) = \lim_{i \to \infty} f_n(x_i) by (3)m,i_{m,i} hence fn(a)=lim⁡k→∞fn(yk)f_n(a) = \lim_{k \to \infty} f_n(y_k). Since x0=ax_0 = a, we deduce from (2)m_m that lim⁡n→∞fn(a)=u(a)\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(a) = u(a). Consequently,

u(a)=lim⁡n→∞lim⁡k→∞fn(yk). u(a) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \lim_{k \to \infty} f_n(y_k) .

Finally, from (1)m_m, we get ∣γ−u(a)∣≥ε|\gamma - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon, and so γ≠u(a)\gamma \neq u(a). This contradicts assertion (iv); we have thus proved that (iv) implies (i).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.