Bourbaki

Theorem 1 (Markoff-Kakutani)

Tag 07WI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07WI].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, Appendix 0. Fixed points of groups of affine transformations

— Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex vector space over the field R\mathbf{R}, and K a non-empty compact convex subset of E. Let Γ\Gamma be a set of continuous affine transformations on K, pairwise permutable. Then there exists a point a in K such that u(a)=au(a) = a for all u∈Γu \in \Gamma.

For every u∈Γu \in \Gamma, let KuK_u be the set of all x∈Kx \in K such that u(x)=xu(x) = x. We shall show that KuK_u is non-empty. Let xx be a point of K; for every integer n≥1n \geq 1, let xnx_n be the element 1n∑i=0n−1ui(x)\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} u^i(x) of E. Since K is convex and stable under uu, the points xnx_n belong to K and since K is compact, there exists a limit point aa of the sequence (xn)n≥1(x_n)_{n \geq 1}. The mapping y↦u(y)−yy \mapsto u(y) - y from K into E is continuous, hence u(a)−au(a) - a is a limit point of the sequence (u(xn)−xn)n≥1(u(x_n) - x_n)_{n \geq 1}. But we have u(xn)−xn=1n(un(x)−x)u(x_n) - x_n = \frac{1}{n} (u^n(x) - x).

Since K is compact, hence also bounded (III, p. 3, prop. 2), the sequence (un(x)−x)n≥1(u^n(x) - x)_{n \geq 1} is bounded; consequently, the sequence (1n(un(x)−x))n≥1\left( \frac{1}{n}(u^n(x) - x) \right)_{n \geq 1} tends to 0 (III, p. 4, prop. 3), and since E is Hausdorff, we have u(a)−a=0u(a) - a = 0. Therefore a∈Kua \in K_u.

Each of the sets KuK_u is a closed and convex subset of the compact space K, and we shall prove that the intersection ⋂u∈ΓKu\bigcap_{u \in \Gamma} K_u is non-empty. For this it is enough to prove that, for n≥1n \geq 1, and u1,...,unu_1, ..., u_n in Γ\Gamma, the set Ku1∩...∩KunK_{u_1} \cap ... \cap K_{u_n} is non-empty. The case n=1n = 1 having been considered, we argue by induction on nn. Suppose n≥2n \geq 2 and put L=Ku1∩...∩Kun−1L = K_{u_1} \cap ... \cap K_{u_{n-1}}. By the hypothesis of induction, L is a non-empty compact convex subset of E. Since unu_n commutes with u1,...,un−1u_1, ..., u_{n-1}, we have un(L)⊂Lu_n(L) \subset L. Applying the first part of the proof to the affine transformation induced by unu_n on L, we conclude that there exists a point aa in L such that un(a)=au_n(a) = a; then aa belongs to Ku1∩...∩KunK_{u_1} \cap ... \cap K_{u_n}, which is then non-empty.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.