Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 07WO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07WO].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter IV, Appendix 0. Fixed points of groups of affine transformations

Suppose KK contains at least two points. For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a partition of KK into two non-empty subsets K1K_1 and K2K_2, having the following properties :

a) K1K_1 is convex and compact ; b) we have ∥x1−x2∥<ε\| x_1 - x_2 \| < \varepsilon for every x1x_1 and x2x_2 in K2K_2.

Let LL be the closure of the set of all extremal points of KK. By the Krein-Milman th. (II, p. 55, th. 1), KK is the closed convex envelope of LL. Since KK contains at least two points, so does LL. For every x∈Lx \in L, let AxA_x be the set of all y∈Ly \in L such that ∥x−y∥≤ε/4\| x - y \| \leq \varepsilon / 4. By the hypothesis, on KK, there exists a countable subset DD of LL such that L=⋃x∈DAxL = \bigcup_{x \in D} A_x. Since the norm is lower semi-continuous, each of the sets AxA_x is closed. Applying Baire’s th. (GT, IX, § 5, No. 3, th. 1) to the compact space LL, we see that there exists a point aa in DD and an open subset UU in EE such that L∩UL \cap U is non-empty and is contained in AaA_a. Since LL contains at least two points, and since EE is Hausdorff, we can choose UU in such a way that L∉UL \notin U.

Let MM be the closed convex envelope of L∩∁UL \cap \complement U. For every real number tt such that 0<t<10 < t < 1, let MtM_t be the set of all vectors of the form tx1+(1−t)x2tx_1 + (1 - t) x_2 with x1∈Mx_1 \in M and x2∈Kx_2 \in K; this is a non-empty, compact convex subset of KK. We shall prove that Mt≠KM_t \neq K by reductio ad absurdum. Suppose that Mt=KM_t = K; then every extremal point xx in KK belongs to MtM_t, hence can be written in the form x=tx1+(1−t)x2x = tx_1 + (1 - t) x_2 with x1∈Mx_1 \in M and x2∈Kx_2 \in K. This implies that x=x1=x2x = x_1 = x_2, and so x∈Mx \in M. By Krein-Milman th. (II, p. 55, th. 1), we have K=MK = M, and KK is the closed convex envelope of L∩∁UL \cap \complement U. By II, p. 56, corollary, this implies that L⊂L∩∁UL \subset L \cap \complement U, which contradicts the relation L∩U≠∅L \cap U \neq \varnothing.

Put d=sup⁡x∈K,y∈K∥x−y∥d = \sup_{x \in K, y \in K} \| x - y \| and choose a real number tt such that 0<t<10 < t < 1 and t<ε/4dt < \varepsilon / 4d. Put K1=MtK_1 = M_t and K2=K−MtK_2 = K - M_t. By the preceding argument, the sets K1K_1 and K2K_2 are non-empty, and K1K_1 is convex and compact. Let M′M' be the closed convex envelope of L∩UL \cap U. Since KK is the closed convex envelope of the set L=(L∩∁U)∪(L∩U)L = (L \cap \complement U) \cup (L \cap U), it is also the closed convex envelope of M∪M′M \cup M'. Let x1x_1 and x2x_2 be two points in K2K_2; for i=1,2i = 1, 2, there exist yi∈My_i \in M, zi∈M′z_i \in M' and a real number αi\alpha_i such that 0≤αi≤10 \leq \alpha_i \leq 1 and xi=αiyi+(1−αi)zix_i = \alpha_i y_i + (1 - \alpha_i) z_i. If αi≥t\alpha_i \geq t, then

xi=tyi+(1−t){αi−t1−tyi+1−αi1−tzi} x_i = t y_i + (1 - t) \left\{ \frac{\alpha_i - t}{1 - t} y_i + \frac{1 - \alpha_i}{1 - t} z_i \right\}
; this contradicts the assumption that xi∉Mix_i \notin M_i. Hence αi<t\alpha_i < t, for i=1,2i = 1, 2, and so
∥xi−zi∥=∥αi(yi−zi)∥=αi∥yi−zi∥≤αid<dt<ε/4. \| x_i - z_i \| = \| \alpha_i (y_i - z_i) \| = \alpha_i \| y_i - z_i \| \leq \alpha_i d < dt < \varepsilon / 4 .
For every point zz in M′M', we have ∥z−a∥≤ε/4\| z - a \| \leq \varepsilon / 4, since L∩U⊂AaL \cap U \subset A_a, and so, in particular ∥zi−a∥≤ε/4\| z_i - a \| \leq \varepsilon / 4. Thus
∥x1−x2∥≤∑i=12(∥xi−zi∥+∥zi−a∥)<ε. \| x_1 - x_2 \| \leq \sum_{i=1}^2 (\| x_i - z_i \| + \| z_i - a \|) < \varepsilon .
This completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.