Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 07X2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07X2].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 1. Prehilbertian spaces and hilbertian spaces

If ff is a hermitian form on EE, and MM a vector subspace of EE such that f(x,x)=0f(x, x) = 0 for all x∈Mx \in M, then we also have f(x,y)=0f(x, y) = 0 for every pair of points x,yx, y in MM.

Let ff be a hermitian form on EE; the set NN of all x∈Ex \in E such that f(x,y)=0f(x, y) = 0 for all y∈Ey \in E is a vector subspace of EE. It follows from (3) that, if x1≡x2x_1 \equiv x_2 (mod. NN) and y1≡y2y_1 \equiv y_2 (mod. NN), we have f(x1,y1)=f(x2,y2)f(x_1, y_1) = f(x_2, y_2); hence, on the quotient space E/NE/N we define a sesquilinear form ff by putting f(x˙,y˙)=f(x,y)f(\dot{x}, \dot{y}) = f(x, y) for all x∈x˙x \in \dot{x} and all y∈y˙y \in \dot{y}; it is clear that ff is hermitian and that the relation «f(x˙,y˙)=0f(\dot{x}, \dot{y}) = 0 for all y˙∈E/N\dot{y} \in E/N» implies x˙=0\dot{x} = 0 in E/NE/N, in other words (A, IX) ff is separating. We say that ff is the separating hermitian form associated with ff.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.