Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 07XT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07XT].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 1. Prehilbertian spaces and hilbertian spaces

*Let E\mathbf{E} be a prehilbertian space and let Φ\Phi be a non-empty, directed decreasing set of non-empty Hausdorff and complete convex subsets of E\mathbf{E}. For every x∈Ex \in \mathbf{E} and every subset H\mathbf{H} of E\mathbf{E}, put d(x,H)=inf⁡z∈H∥x−z∥d(x, \mathbf{H}) = \inf_{z \in \mathbf{H}} \| x - z \|. In order that the intersection M of the sets H belonging to Φ\Phi be non-empty, it is necessary and sufficient that there exists x0x_0 in E such that sup⁡H∈Φd(x0,H)\sup_{H \in \Phi} d(x_0, H) is finite. For every x∈Ex \in E we then have

pM(x)=lim⁡H∈ΦpH(x) p_M(x) = \lim_{H \in \Phi} p_H(x)
(limit with respect to the directed set Φ\Phi).

If M is non-empty, d(x,H)≤d(x,M)d(x, H) \leq d(x, M) for all H∈ΦH \in \Phi and all x∈Ex \in E.

Conversely, suppose that there exists a point x0x_0 in E and a real number C≥0C \geq 0 such that d(x0,H)≤Cd(x_0, H) \leq C for all H∈ΦH \in \Phi. Let x∈Ex \in E; then

d(x,H)≤∥x−x0∥+Cfor all H∈Φ, d(x, H) \leq \|x - x_0\| + C \quad \text{for all } H \in \Phi,
hence the number d=sup⁡H∈Φd(x,H)d = \sup_{H \in \Phi} d(x, H) is finite. Let B be the set of all z∈Ez \in E such that ∥x−z∥≤d\|x - z\| \leq d. Since B is convex and closed in E, the sets H∩BH \cap B, for H ranging over Φ\Phi, are convex, Hausdorff and complete. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0; there exists a set H∈ΦH \in \Phi such that d(x,H)≥d−εd(x, H) \geq d - \varepsilon, and if ε<d/2\varepsilon < d/2, the diameter of H∩BH \cap B is bounded by 12ε(d−ε)\sqrt{12 \varepsilon (d - \varepsilon)} by prop. 5 (V, p. 9). In other words, for all H0∈ΦH_0 \in \Phi, the closed sets H∩BH \cap B, for H∈ΦH \in \Phi and H⊂H0H \subset H_0, form a base of the Cauchy filter on the Hausdorff and complete space H0H_0. Hence the intersection of the sets H∩BH \cap B (for H∈ΦH \in \Phi) reduces to a point y. We get y∈My \in M and ∥x−y∥=d=d(x,M)\|x - y\| = d = d(x, M). Since M is closed in H0H_0, it is a Hausdorff, convex and complete set in E, and so y=pM(x)y = p_M(x). For every H∈ΦH \in \Phi, we have pH(x)∈H∩Bp_H(x) \in H \cap B, from which we get that pM(x)=lim⁡H∈ΦpH(x)p_M(x) = \lim_{H \in \Phi} p_H(x).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.