Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 080B, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 080B].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter V, § 3. Tensor product of hilbertian spaces

— The sesquilinear form Φ\Phi on E1⊗E2E_1 \otimes E_2 is hermitian and positive, hence assigns the structure of a prehilbertian space to E1⊗E2E_1 \otimes E_2. This space is Hausdorff if E1E_1 and E2E_2 are Hausdorff.

The formula Φ(z,t)=Φ(t,z)‾\Phi(z, t) = \overline{\Phi(t, z)} follows from (3) when z=x1⊗x2z = x_1 \otimes x_2 and t=y1⊗y2t = y_1 \otimes y_2. The general case is obtained by linearity, hence Φ\Phi is hermitian.

Suppose E1E_1 and E2E_2 are Hausdorff; we shall prove that the hermitian form Φ\Phi is positive and separating. Let z=∑i=1nxi⊗yiz = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \otimes y_i be a non-zero element of F=E1⊗E2F = E_1 \otimes E_2. Let (e1,...,en)(e_1, ..., e_n) be an orthonormal basis of the subspace of E1E_1 generated by x1,...,xnx_1, ..., x_n (V, p. 23, cor. 1). There exist elements f1,...,fmf_1, ..., f_m in E2E_2, not all null, such that z=∑i=1nei⊗fiz = \sum_{i=1}^n e_i \otimes f_i, hence

Φ(z,z)=∑i,j=1mΦ(ei⊗fi,ej⊗fj) \Phi(z, z) = \sum_{i,j=1}^m \Phi(e_i \otimes f_i, e_j \otimes f_j)
=∑i,j⟨ei∣ej⟩⟨fi∣fj⟩=∑i=1m∥fi∥2>0. = \sum_{i,j} \langle e_i | e_j \rangle \langle f_i | f_j \rangle = \sum_{i=1}^m \| f_i \|^2 > 0.

For the general case, we shall now prove that Φ\Phi is positive. Let E~i\tilde{E}_i be the Hausdorff prehilbertian space associated with EiE_i and let πi\pi_i be the canonical mapping from EiE_i onto E~i\tilde{E}_i (i=1,2i = 1, 2). Put π=π1⊗π2\pi = \pi_1 \otimes \pi_2. Let Φ~\tilde{\Phi} be the hermitian form on E~1⊗E~2\tilde{E}_1 \otimes \tilde{E}_2 constructed in the same way as Φ\Phi. We have

Φ(z,t)=Φ(π(z),π(t))(z∈F, t∈F), \Phi(z, t) = \Phi(\pi(z), \pi(t)) \quad (z \in F, \ t \in F),
and since Φ~\tilde{\Phi} is positive, so is Φ\Phi.

The prehilbertian space defined in prop. 1 is called the tensor product of the prehilbertian spaces E1E_1 and E2E_2 and is written as E1⊗E2E_1 \otimes E_2. Henceforth we shall write ⟨z∣t⟩\langle z|t \rangle for Φ(z,t)\Phi(z, t), and therefore by definition

⟨x1⊗x2∣y1⊗y2⟩=⟨x1∣y1⟩⟨x2∣y2⟩; \langle x_1 \otimes x_2 | y_1 \otimes y_2 \rangle = \langle x_1 | y_1 \rangle \langle x_2 | y_2 \rangle;
we shall also write ∥z∥2\|z\|_2 or ∥z∥\|z\| for ⟨z∣z⟩1/2\langle z|z \rangle^{1/2}. From (4), we get
∥x1⊗x2∥2=∥x1∥⋅∥x2∥, \|x_1 \otimes x_2\|_2 = \|x_1\| \cdot \|x_2\|,
then the bilinear mapping (x1,x2)↦x1⊗x2(x_1, x_2) \mapsto x_1 \otimes x_2 from E1×E2E_1 \times E_2 into E1⊗E2E_1 \otimes E_2 is continuous.

For i=1,2i = 1, 2 let FiF_i be a vector subspace of EiE_i, endowed with the induced prehilbertian structure. Then F1⊗F2F_1 \otimes F_2 can be identified with a vector subspace of E1⊗E2E_1 \otimes E_2 (A, II, § 7, No. 7). Formula (4) shows that F1⊗F2F_1 \otimes F_2 with the prehilbertian space structure induced by that of E1⊗2E2E_1 \otimes_2 E_2, is exactly F1⊗2F2F_1 \otimes_2 F_2. We shall henceforth identify F1⊗2F2F_1 \otimes_2 F_2 with a prehilbertian subspace of E1⊗2E2E_1 \otimes_2 E_2.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.