Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 080K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 080K].

Topological Vector Spaces, V, p. 30, § 3. Tensor product of hilbertian spaces

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} be an orthonormal basis of the hilbertian space EE. For every α\alpha in N(I)\mathbf{N}^{(I)}, put

zα=∏i∈Ieiαi/(αi!)1/2. z_{\alpha} = \prod_{i \in I} e_i^{\alpha_i}/(\alpha_i!)^{1/2} .

Then (zα)α∈N(I)(z_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^{(I)}} is an orthonormal basis of S^(E)\hat{\mathbf{S}}(E).

Let E0E_0 be the vector subspace of EE generated by the vectors eie_i for ii ranging over II. Then the zαz_{\alpha} form a basis of the vector space S(E0)\mathbf{S}(E_0) (A, III, § 6, No. 6). But E0E_0 is dense in EE, and the multilinear mapping (x1,…,xn)↦x1…xn(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto x_1 \ldots x_n from E×⋯×EE \times \cdots \times E into S(E)\mathbf{S}(E) is continuous for all n⩾1n \geqslant 1; hence S(E0)\mathbf{S}(E_0) is dense in S(E)\mathbf{S}(E). It is now enough to prove that the family of the zαz_\alpha is orthonormal. First observe that S^n(E)\hat{S}^n(E) and S^m(E)\hat{S}^m(E) are orthogonal for n≠mn \neq m. Hence it is enough to prove the formula

⟨zα∣zβ⟩={1if α=β0if α≠β \langle z_\alpha | z_\beta \rangle = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1 & \text{if } \alpha = \beta \\ 0 & \text{if } \alpha \neq \beta \end{array} \right.

when ∣α∣=∑i∈Iαi|\alpha| = \sum_{i \in I} \alpha_i and ∣β∣=∑i∈Iβi|\beta| = \sum_{i \in I} \beta_i are equal to the same integer nn.

Consider a partition (Pi)i∈I(P_i)_{i \in I} of the set {1,2,...,n}\{ 1, 2, ..., n \} such that Card Pi=αiP_i = \alpha_i for all i∈Ii \in I. Put xk=eix_k = e_i if kk belongs to PiP_i, then x1...xn=∏i∈Ieiαix_1 ... x_n = \prod_{i \in I} e_i^{\alpha_i}. Similarly we define (Qi)i∈I(Q_i)_{i \in I} and yky_k in such a way that Card Qi=βiQ_i = \beta_i and y1...yn=∏i∈Ieiβiy_1 ... y_n = \prod_{i \in I} e_i^{\beta_i}. Since the eie_i are mutually orthogonal, we have ⟨xk∣yσ(k)⟩=0\langle x_k | y_{\sigma(k)} \rangle = 0 except if there exists an indice i∈Ii \in I such that k∈Pik \in P_i and σ(k)∈Qi\sigma(k) \in Q_i. By formula (15), we then have ⟨x1...xn∣y1...yn⟩=0\langle x_1 ... x_n | y_1 ... y_n \rangle = 0 unless there exists a permutation σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n such that σ(Pi)=Qi\sigma(P_i) = Q_i for all i∈Ii \in I, which implies that α=β\alpha = \beta. Then ⟨zα∣zβ⟩=0\langle z_\alpha | z_\beta \rangle = 0 for α≠β\alpha \neq \beta. The same argument proves that ∥x1...xn∥2\| x_1 ... x_n \| ^2 is equal to the number of the σ∈Sn\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_n such that σ(Pi)=Pi\sigma(P_i) = P_i for all i∈Ii \in I, hence equal to ∏i∈Iαi!\prod_{i \in I} \alpha_i !. We get ∥zα∥=1\| z_\alpha \| = 1, and the proposition is proved.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.