For every hermitian endomorphism u of E, we have
∥u∥=∥x∥⩽1sup∣⟨x∣u(x)⟩∣.
Put Φ=Φu and c=sup∥x∥⩽1∣Φ(x,x)∣, then evidently c⩽∥u∥. Let x,y be in E such that ∥x∥⩽1,∥y∥⩽1. Then
Φ(x+y,x+y)=Φ(x,x)+Φ(y,y)+2ℜΦ(x,y), hence
4ℜΦ(x,y)=Φ(x+y,x+y)−Φ(x−y,x−y); but
∣Φ(t,t)∣⩽c∥t∥2 for all
t∈E, thus
4∣ℜΦ(x,y)∣⩽c(∥x+y∥2+∥x−y∥2)=2c(∥x∥2+∥y∥2)⩽4c. Let
a=Φ(x,y); there exists a complex number
λ with absolute value 1 such that
λa = |a|. Replacing y by λy in the preceding inequality, we get ∣Φ(x,y)∣≤c. By (15), ∥u∥≤c and the proposition follows. Q.E.D.
Evidently every hermitian endomorphism is normal. Conversely :
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.