Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 0864, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0864].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter I, § 4. CONVEX FUNCTIONS OF A REAL VARIABLE

Let ff be a finite real function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}. For ff to be convex on II it is necessary and sufficient that for every pair of numbers a,ba, b of II such that a<ba < b, and for every real number μ\mu, the function f(x)+μxf(x) + \mu x attains its supremum on [a,b][a, b] at one of the points a,ba, b.

The condition is necessary; indeed, since μx\mu x is convex on R\mathbf{R}, the function f(x)+μxf(x) + \mu x is convex on II; one can therefore restrict oneself to the case μ=0\mu = 0. Then, for

x=λa+(1−λ)b(0≤λ≤1), x = \lambda a + (1 - \lambda) b \quad (0 \leq \lambda \leq 1),
one has
f(x)≤λf(a)+(1−λ)f(b)≤Max⁡(f(a),f(b)). f(x) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1 - \lambda) f(b) \leq \operatorname{Max}(f(a), f(b)).

The condition is sufficient. Let us take μ=−f(b)−f(a)b−a\mu = -\frac{f(b) - f(a)}{b - a} and let g(x)=f(x)+μxg(x) = f(x) + \mu x; one has g(a)=g(b)g(a) = g(b) and therefore g(x)≤g(a)g(x) \leq g(a) for all x∈[a,b]x \in [a, b], and one can check immediately that this inequality is equivalent to the inequality (1) where one replaces zz by aa and x′x' by bb.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.