Bourbaki

Example

Tag 08G5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08G5].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter V, § 4. APPLICATION TO SERIES WITH POSITIVE TERMS

Let g(x)=xλ=exp⁡(λlog⁡x)g(x) = x^\lambda = \exp(\lambda \log x), of order +∞+\infty relative to eλe^\lambda. Taking p=2p = 2 one has

(n−1)log⁡(n−1)=(n−1)log⁡n−1+12n+o(1n) (n-1)\log(n-1) = (n-1)\log n - 1 + \frac{1}{2n} + o\left( \frac{1}{n} \right)

whence (V, p. 225)

(n−1)n−1=1enn−1+12enn−2+o1(nn−2) (n-1)^{n-1} = \frac{1}{e} n^{n-1} + \frac{1}{2e} n^{n-2} + o_1\left( n^{n-2} \right)

and similarly

(n−2)n−2=1e2nn−2+o2(nn−2); (n-2)^{n-2} = \frac{1}{e^2} n^{n-2} + o_2\left( n^{n-2} \right);

consequently

sn=nn+1enn−1+(12e+1e2)nn−2+o3(nn−2). s_n = n^n + \frac{1}{e} n^{n-1} + \left( \frac{1}{2e} + \frac{1}{e^2} \right) n^{n-2} + o_3\left( n^{n-2} \right).

One proceeds similarly (for rnr_n) when gg is of order −∞-\infty relative to eλe^\lambda.

Now if gg is of finite order μ\mu relative to exe^x, and if, for example, ∑n=1∞g(n)=+∞\sum_{n=1}^\infty g(n) = +\infty, one can write

sn=μ1−e−μ∫1ng(t) dt+∑m=1nf1(m) s_n = \frac{\mu}{1 - e^{-\mu}} \int_1^n g(t)\, dt + \sum_{m=1}^n f_1(m)
where f1(n)=g(n)−μ1−e−μ∫1ng(t) dt≪g(n)f_1(n) = g(n) - \frac{\mu}{1 - e^{-\mu}} \int_1^n g(t)\, dt \ll g(n) by prop. 6 of V, p. 239. If one has a principal part cg1(n)c g_1(n) of f1(n)f_1(n) relative to E′\mathscr{E}', and if one can again apply prop. 6 to the function g1g_1 one will obtain a primitive equivalent to ∑m=1nf1(m)\sum_{m=1}^n f_1(m) if ∑n=1∞g1(n)=+∞\sum_{n=1}^\infty g_1(n) = +\infty, and equivalent to ∑m=n+1∞f1(m)\sum_{m=n+1}^\infty f_1(m) in the opposite case (in the latter case one writes ∑m=1nf1(m)=C−∑m=n+1∞f1(m)\sum_{m=1}^n f_1(m) = C - \sum_{m=n+1}^\infty f_1(m), with C=∑n=1∞f1(n)C = \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_1(n)).

Step by step one can thus eventually obtain an expression for sns_n as the sum of a certain number of primitives each of which is negligible with respect to the previous, of a term remaining negligible relative to the last primitive written, and finally a constant (the case where the remainder term tends to 0). It then remains to expand each of the primitives obtained with respect to E′\mathscr{E}' (cf. V, p. 235).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.