Let f be a function admitting a continuous (n+1)th derivative on I, and belonging, with all its derivatives f(m) for 1≤m≤n, to E. If U is a composition operator of order p≤n on E one has, for x≥0 and h≥0
f(p)(x+h)=m=0∑nm!1um(x)Uhξ(f(m)(ξ))+Rn(x,h) (27)
with
Rn(x,h)=−Uhξ(∫0ξ−x−hn!1un(x+η)f(n+1)(ξ−η)dη) (28)
(generalized Taylor expansion).
Consider the integral ∫0ξ−x−hn!1un(x+η)f(n+1)(ξ−η)dη, defined for all ξ∈I, and apply to it the formula for integration by parts of order n+1 (II, p. 59, formula (11)); taking account of the relations
un(k)=n(n−1)…(n−k+1)un−k derived from (7) (VI, p. 273) by recursion, one obtains
∫0ξ−x−hn!1un(x+η)f(n+1)(ξ−η)dη =m=0∑nm!1um(x)f(m)(ξ)−m=0∑nm!1um(ξ−h)f(m)(x+h). (29)
We apply the operator U to the two sides of (29), considered as functions of ξ, then take the value of the function so obtained for the value h of the variable ξ; remarking that, by the formulae (26) (VI, p. 277) and (9) (VI, p. 272), one has
Uhξ(um(ξ−h))=U0ξ(um(ξ))={0p!for m=pfor m=p one finally obtains (27).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.