Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 08OF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08OF].

Integration, chapter III, § 4. Products of measures

Let EE be a Hausdorff locally convex space, and let ff be a mapping in K(X×Y;E)\mathscr{K}(X \times Y; E) such that f(X×Y)f(X \times Y) is contained in a complete convex subset CC of EE. Then, for every y∈Yy \in Y, the integral h(y)=∫f(x,y) dλ(x)h(y) = \int f(x, y)\, d\lambda(x) belongs to EE (§3, No. 3, Prop. 7); moreover, the function hh belongs to K~(Y;E)\widetilde{\mathscr{K}}(Y; E): indeed, for every z′∈E′z' \in E' we have

⟨h(y),z′⟩=∫⟨f(x,y),z′⟩ dλ(x), \langle h(y), z' \rangle = \int \langle f(x, y), z' \rangle\, d\lambda(x),

therefore y↦⟨h(y),z′⟩y \mapsto \langle h(y), z' \rangle belongs to K(Y;C)\mathscr{K}(Y; C) by Lemma 2. The integral ∫h dμ\int h\, d\mu is therefore defined (and a priori belongs to E′∗{E'}^*); let us show that

∬f(x,y) dλ(x) dμ(y)=∫dμ(y)∫f(x,y) dλ(x) \iint f(x, y)\, d\lambda(x)\, d\mu(y) = \int d\mu(y) \int f(x, y)\, d\lambda(x)
=∫dλ(x)∫f(x,y) dμ(y), = \int d\lambda(x) \int f(x, y)\, d\mu(y),

thus generalizing the formula (4). Indeed, for every z′∈E′z' \in E' we have

⟨∫∫fdλdμ,z′⟩=∫∫⟨f,z′⟩dλdμ=∫dμ∫⟨f,z′⟩dλ=∫⟨∫fdλ,z′⟩dμ=⟨∫dμ∫fdλ,z′⟩ \left\langle \int \int f d\lambda d\mu, z' \right\rangle = \int \int \langle f, z' \rangle d\lambda d\mu = \int d\mu \int \langle f, z' \rangle d\lambda \\ = \int \left\langle \int f d\lambda, z' \right\rangle d\mu = \left\langle \int d\mu \int f d\lambda, z' \right\rangle
by (4), whence (5).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.