Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 08VH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08VH].

Integration, IV, p. 70, § 5. Measurable functions and sets

Let F be a locally convex space that is the direct limit of a sequence of separable metrizable locally convex spaces FnF_n, F being the union of the FnF_n. Let F′F' be the dual of F, equipped with the weak topology σ(F′,F)\sigma(F', F). For a mapping f of X into F′F' to be measurable, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every a∈Fa \in F, the scalar function x↦⟨a,f(x)⟩x \mapsto \langle a, f(x) \rangle be measurable.

The condition is necessary by No. 3, Th. 1; let us prove that it is sufficient. Suppose first that F is metrizable and separable, and let D be a countable dense set in F. Let (Vn)(V_n) be a decreasing fundamental sequence of balanced convex open neighborhoods of 0 in F; the polar sets Vn∘V_n^\circ are equicontinuous and their union is all of F′F'. Let Xn=f−1(Vn∘)X_n = f^{-1}(V_n^\circ); the sequence (Xn)(X_n) is increasing and X=⋃nXnX = \bigcup_n X_n; let us show that each XnX_n is μ\mu-measurable. Indeed, D∩VnD \cap V_n is dense in VnV_n; for every y∈D∩Vny \in D \cap V_n let SyS_y be the set of x∈Xx \in X such that ∣⟨y,f(x)⟩∣≤1|\langle y, f(x) \rangle| \leq 1; the hypothesis implies that each of the SyS_y is measurable, and XnX_n is the intersection of the countable family of SyS_y for y∈D∩Vny \in D \cap V_n. This being so, for every compact subset K of X and every ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists an integer n such that ∣μ∣(K−(K∩Xn))≤ε/4|\mu|(K - (K \cap X_n)) \leq \varepsilon/4, and then a compact subset K1K_1 of K∩XnK \cap X_n such that ∣μ∣((K∩Xn)−K1)≤ε/4|\mu|((K \cap X_n) - K_1) \leq \varepsilon/4; finally, there exists a compact subset K2K_2 of K1K_1 such that ∣μ∣(K1−K2)≤ε/2|\mu|(K_1 - K_2) \leq \varepsilon/2 and such that the restrictions to K2K_2 of all of the functions ⟨y,f⟩\langle y, f \rangle, where y∈Dy \in D, are continuous (No. 1, Prop. 2). Since the set f(K2)⊂f(Xn)⊂Vn∘f(K_2) \subset f(X_n) \subset V_n^\circ is equicontinuous, the topology induced by σ(F′,F)\sigma(F', F) on f(K2)f(K_2) is identical to the topology of pointwise convergence in D (GT, X, §2, No. 4, Th. 1); the restriction of f to K2K_2 is therefore continuous, whence our assertion in this first case.

Let us pass to the general case. If z′z' is a continuous linear form on F, its restriction zn′z'_n to FnF_n is continuous; since F=⋃nFnF = \bigcup_n F_n, the dual F′F' of F may be identified (algebraically) with a linear subspace of the product ∏nFn′\prod_n F'_n, and then pr⁡n(z′)=zn′\operatorname{pr}_n(z') = z'_n. Moreover, since each finite subset of F is contained in one of the FnF_n, the topology σ(F′,F)\sigma(F', F) is none other than the topology induced by the product topology of the topologies σ(Fn′,Fn)\sigma(F'_n, F_n). This being so, if ⟨a,f⟩\langle a, f \rangle is measurable for every a∈Fa \in F, then so is ⟨an,pr⁡n∘f⟩\langle a_n, \operatorname{pr}_n \circ f \rangle for every n and every an∈Fna_n \in F_n, since ⟨an,pr⁡n∘f⟩=⟨an,f⟩\langle a_n, \operatorname{pr}_n \circ f \rangle = \langle a_n, f \rangle; the first part of the proof then shows that pr⁡n∘f\operatorname{pr}_n \circ f is measurable for every n, therefore so is f (No. 3, Th. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.