Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 08XH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08XH].

Integration, IV, p. 91, § 6. Convexity inequalities

For every mapping ff of XX into a Banach space FF, one sets N∞(f)=M∞(∣f∣)N_\infty(f) = M_\infty(|f|); ff is said to be bounded in measure (for the measure μ\mu) if N∞(f)N_\infty(f) is finite. The set of mappings of XX into FF that are measurable and bounded in measure is denoted LF∞(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_F^\infty(X, \mu) (or LF∞(μ)\mathscr{L}_F^\infty(\mu), or simply LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty).

A function ff in LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty may thus be characterized by the fact that there exists a bounded measurable function equal locally almost everywhere to ff.

It follows immediately from (1) that

N∞(f+g)⩽N∞(f)+N∞(g); N_\infty(f + g) \leqslant N_\infty(f) + N_\infty(g);

on the other hand, N∞(αf)=∣α∣N∞(f)N_\infty(\alpha f) = |\alpha| N_\infty(f) for every scalar α\alpha. The set LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty is therefore a linear subspace of the space of all mappings of XX into FF, and N∞(f)N_\infty(f) is a semi-norm on this vector space. Let (fn)(f_n) be a sequence of functions in LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty that converges to f∈LF∞f \in \mathscr{L}_F^\infty for the topology defined by the semi-norm N∞(f)N_\infty(f); for every integer mm, there exist a locally negligible set HmH_m and an integer n0n_0 such that ∣f(x)−fn(x)∣≤1/m|f(x) - f_n(x)| \leq 1/m for every integer n≥n0n \geq n_0 and every x∉Hmx \notin H_m (every countable union of locally negligible sets being locally negligible); the union HH of the HmH_m is locally negligible, and one sees that fn(x)f_n(x) tends uniformly to f(x)f(x) on the complement of the locally negligible set HH; the converse is immediate.

It is clear that every function equal locally almost everywhere to a function in LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty belongs to LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty. In particular, the locally negligible functions defined on XX with values in FF form a linear subspace NF∞\mathscr{N}_F^\infty of LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty, characterized by the relation N∞(f)=0N_\infty(f) = 0 (the closure of 0 for the topology defined by N∞(f)N_\infty(f)). The Hausdorff space associated with LF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty, that is, the quotient space LF∞/NF∞\mathscr{L}_F^\infty / \mathscr{N}_F^\infty, is denoted LF∞(X,μ)L_F^\infty(X, \mu) (or LF∞(μ)L_F^\infty(\mu) or LF∞L_F^\infty); its topology is defined by the norm deduced from N∞N_\infty by passage to the quotient; the norm of a class f˙∈LF∞\dot{f} \in L_F^\infty is denoted N∞(f˙)N_\infty(\dot{f}), or also ∥f˙∥∞\| \dot{f} \|_\infty. When F=RF = \mathbf{R} (resp. C\mathbf{C}), we write L∞\mathscr{L}^\infty and L∞L^\infty in place of LR∞\mathscr{L}_\mathbf{R}^\infty and LR∞L_\mathbf{R}^\infty (resp. LC∞\mathscr{L}_\mathbf{C}^\infty and LC∞L_\mathbf{C}^\infty) if this can cause no confusion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.