Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 08XT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08XT].

Integration, chapter IV, § 6. Convexity inequalities

— *Let ff be a measurable function with values in a Banach space FF; the set II of numbers pp, such that 1≤p≤+∞1 \leq p \leq +\infty and Np(f)N_p(f) is finite, is either empty or is an interval of R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}}. If II is nonempty, the restriction to II of the mapping p↦Np(f)p \mapsto N_p(f) is continuous; moreover, if ff is not negligible, log⁡Np(f)\log N_p(f) is a convex function of 1/p1/p on Iˉ\bar{I}.

We already know (Ch. I, No. 3, Prop. 5) that the set JJ of finite numbers p≥1p \geq 1 such that Np(f)<+∞N_p(f) < +\infty is either empty or is an interval, and that log⁡Np(f)\log N_p(f) is a convex function of 1/p1/p on JJ (when ff is not negligible); this of course implies the continuity of p↦Np(f)p \mapsto N_p(f) on JJ.

If JJ is empty then either I=∅I = \varnothing or I={+∞}I = \{+\infty\}, and the proposition is obvious in this case; assume henceforth that JJ is nonempty. The proposition is also obvious if ff is negligible; assume henceforth that ff is not negligible. If s∈Js \in J then, for every finite number p>sp > s, ∣f∣p=∣f∣s∣f∣p−s|f|^p = |f|^s |f|^{p-s}, and the inequality of the mean shows that

(12)Np(f)≤(Ns(f))s/p(N∞(f))(p−s)/p. (12) \quad N_p(f) \leq (N_s(f))^{s/p} (N_\infty(f))^{(p-s)/p}.

Letting pp tend to +∞+\infty, it follows that

lim sup⁡p→+∞Np(f)≤N∞(f). \limsup_{p \to +\infty} N_p(f) \leq N_\infty(f).

This proves that if +∞∈I+\infty \in I then JJ contains arbitrarily large numbers; thus II is indeed an interval of R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}}, and I‾=J‾\overline{I} = \overline{J}. The proposition will be proved if we show that p↦Np(f)p \mapsto N_p(f) is continuous on J‾\overline{J}, and it suffices to establish continuity at the end-points of JJ. We can suppose, moreover, that JJ does not reduce to a point. Let rr and ss be the left and right end-points of JJ (r<s≤+∞r < s \leq +\infty). Let AA be the (measurable) set of x∈Xx \in X such that ∣f(x)∣≥1|f(x)| \geq 1; then

∫∣f∣pd∣μ∣=∫∣f∣pφAd∣μ∣+∫∣f∣pφCAd∣μ∣. \int |f|^p d|\mu| = \int |f|^p \varphi_A d|\mu| + \int |f|^p \varphi_{C_A} d|\mu|.

As p∈Jp \in J tends to rr, ∣f∣pφA|f|^p \varphi_A tends to ∣f∣rφA|f|^r \varphi_A while decreasing, and ∣f∣pφCA|f|^p \varphi_{C_A} tends to ∣f∣rφCA|f|^r \varphi_{C_A} while increasing. Thus ∫∣f∣pφCAd∣μ∣\int |f|^p \varphi_{C_A} d|\mu| tends to ∫∗∣f∣rφCAd∣μ∣\int^* |f|^r \varphi_{C_A} d|\mu| (§ 1, No. 3, Th. 3). On the other hand, ∣f∣pφA|f|^p \varphi_A is integrable for p∈Jp \in J, and ∫∣f∣pφAd∣μ∣\int |f|^p \varphi_A d|\mu| tends to ∫∣f∣rφAd∣μ∣\int |f|^r \varphi_A d|\mu| (§ 4, No. 3, Prop. 4). Therefore ∫∣f∣pd∣μ∣\int |f|^p d|\mu| tends to ∫∗∣f∣rd∣μ∣\int^* |f|^r d|\mu|, which proves the continuity of p↦Np(f)p \mapsto N_p(f) at rr.

The same reasoning may be applied at the point ss if s<+∞s < +\infty. Finally, suppose that s=+∞s = +\infty. In view of (13), it suffices to prove that

lim inf⁡p→+∞Np(f)≥N∞(f). \liminf_{p \to +\infty} N_p(f) \geq N_\infty(f).

Now, let aa be a number such that 0<a<N∞(f)0 < a < N_\infty(f). Since, by hypothesis, there exist finite values of pp such that Np(f)<+∞N_p(f) < +\infty, the set AA of x∈Xx \in X such that ∣f(x)∣≥a|f(x)| \geq a, which is measurable and non-negligible, is integrable by virtue of the inequality φA≤(∣f∣/a)p\varphi_A \leq (|f|/a)^p; moreover, we infer from this inequality that Np(f)≥a⋅(∣μ∣(A))1/pN_p(f) \geq a \cdot (|\mu|(A))^{1/p}; letting pp tend to +∞+\infty, it follows that lim inf⁡p→+∞Np(f)≥a\liminf_{p \to +\infty} N_p(f) \geq a, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.