Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 092H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 092H].

Integration, chapter V, § 5. Measures defined by numerical densities

— Let θ\theta be a complex measure, and let ff be an element of L‾C1(T,θ)\overline{\mathscr{L}}^1_C(T, \theta). Then

⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩=sup⁡c∈K1∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣=sup⁡c∈B1∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣, \langle|\theta|, |f|\rangle = \sup_{c \in \mathscr{K}_1} |\langle\theta, cf\rangle| = \sup_{c \in \mathscr{B}_1} |\langle\theta, cf\rangle|,

*where K1\mathscr{K}_1 (resp. B1\mathscr{B}_1) denotes the set of complex functions cc, continuous with compact support (resp. Borel), such that ∣c∣≤1|c| \leq 1.

Let us first treat the case that f∈K(T;C)f \in \mathscr{K}(T; \mathbf{C}). Obviously

sup⁡c∈K1∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣≤sup⁡c∈B1∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩ \sup_{c \in \mathscr{K}_1} |\langle\theta, cf\rangle| \leq \sup_{c \in \mathscr{B}_1} |\langle\theta, cf\rangle| \leq \langle|\theta|, |f|\rangle

(Ch. IV, §4, No. 2, Prop. 2). On the other hand, let gg be an element of K(T;C)\mathscr{K}(T; \mathbf{C}) such that ∣g∣≤∣f∣|g| \leq |f|; gg is the uniform limit of a sequence (gn)(g_n) of elements of K(T;C)\mathscr{K}(T; \mathbf{C}) whose supports are contained in the open set UU formed by the tt such that f(t)≠0f(t) \neq 0, and one may clearly suppose that ∣gn∣≤∣f∣|g_n| \leq |f| for every nn. Set cn(t)=gn(t)/f(t)c_n(t) = g_n(t)/f(t) for t∈Ut \in U, cn(t)=0c_n(t) = 0 for t∉Ut \notin U; then cn∈K1c_n \in \mathscr{K}_1, g=lim⁡n→∞cnfg = \lim_{n \to \infty} c_n f, therefore ∣⟨θ,g⟩∣=lim⁡n→∞∣⟨θ,cnf⟩∣|\langle\theta, g\rangle| = \lim_{n \to \infty} |\langle\theta, c_n f\rangle|, and finally

sup⁡∣g∣≤∣f∣,g∈K(T;C)∣⟨θ,g⟩∣≤sup⁡c∈K1∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣. \sup_{|g| \leq |f|, g \in \mathscr{K}(T; \mathbf{C})} |\langle\theta, g\rangle| \leq \sup_{c \in \mathscr{K}_1} |\langle\theta, cf\rangle|.

One concludes by observing that the first member of this inequality is equal to ⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩\langle |\theta|, |f| \rangle (Ch. III, §1, No. 6, formula (12)).

Next, denote by ff an element of L‾C1(θ)\overline{\mathscr{L}}_C^1(\theta), and let us show that (4) is again true: it suffices to verify that the three members of this relation depend continuously on ff for the topology of L‾C1(θ)\overline{\mathscr{L}}_C^1(\theta), since they coincide on the dense subspace K(T;C)\mathscr{K}(T; \mathbf{C}). This results at once from the following inequalities, where ff and f′f' denote elements of L‾C1(θ)\overline{\mathscr{L}}_C^1(\theta):

∣⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩−⟨∣θ∣,∣f′∣⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣f−f′∣⟩=N‾1(f−f′) |\langle |\theta|, |f| \rangle - \langle |\theta|, |f'| \rangle| \leq \langle |\theta|, |f - f'| \rangle = \overline{N}_1(f - f')
∣⟨θ,cf⟩−⟨θ,cf′⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣c∣∣f−f′∣⟩≤N‾1(f−f′) |\langle \theta, cf \rangle - \langle \theta, cf' \rangle| \leq \langle |\theta|, |c||f - f'| \rangle \leq \overline{N}_1(f - f')

for all c∈B1c \in \mathscr{B}_1. The lemma is thus established.

Passing to the proof of Proposition 2, let us apply the lemma to the function uhuh, where hh belongs to K+(T)\mathscr{K}_+(T). This yields:

⟨∣θ∣,∣uh∣⟩=sup⁡c∈K1∣⟨θ,cuh⟩∣=sup⁡c∈K1∣⟨u⋅θ,ch⟩∣=⟨∣u⋅θ∣,h⟩. \langle |\theta|, |uh| \rangle = \sup_{c \in \mathscr{K}_1} |\langle \theta, cuh \rangle| = \sup_{c \in \mathscr{K}_1} |\langle u \cdot \theta, ch \rangle| = \langle |u \cdot \theta|, h \rangle .

However, the first member is also equal to

⟨∣θ∣,∣u∣h⟩=⟨∣u∣⋅∣θ∣,h⟩. \langle |\theta|, |u|h \rangle = \langle |u| \cdot |\theta|, h \rangle .

The two measures ∣u∣⋅∣θ∣|u| \cdot |\theta| and ∣u⋅θ∣|u \cdot \theta| are therefore equal.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.