— Let θ be a complex measure, and let f be an element of LC1(T,θ). Then
⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩=c∈K1sup∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣=c∈B1sup∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣,
*where K1 (resp. B1) denotes the set of complex functions c, continuous with compact support (resp. Borel), such that ∣c∣≤1.
Let us first treat the case that f∈K(T;C). Obviously
c∈K1sup∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣≤c∈B1sup∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩
(Ch. IV, §4, No. 2, Prop. 2). On the other hand, let g be an element of K(T;C) such that ∣g∣≤∣f∣; g is the uniform limit of a sequence (gn) of elements of K(T;C) whose supports are contained in the open set U formed by the t such that f(t)=0, and one may clearly suppose that ∣gn∣≤∣f∣ for every n. Set cn(t)=gn(t)/f(t) for t∈U, cn(t)=0 for t∈/U; then cn∈K1, g=limn→∞cnf, therefore ∣⟨θ,g⟩∣=limn→∞∣⟨θ,cnf⟩∣, and finally
∣g∣≤∣f∣,g∈K(T;C)sup∣⟨θ,g⟩∣≤c∈K1sup∣⟨θ,cf⟩∣.
One concludes by observing that the first member of this inequality is equal to ⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩ (Ch. III, §1, No. 6, formula (12)).
Next, denote by f an element of LC1(θ), and let us show that (4) is again true: it suffices to verify that the three members of this relation depend continuously on f for the topology of LC1(θ), since they coincide on the dense subspace K(T;C). This results at once from the following inequalities, where f and f′ denote elements of LC1(θ):
∣⟨∣θ∣,∣f∣⟩−⟨∣θ∣,∣f′∣⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣f−f′∣⟩=N1(f−f′)
∣⟨θ,cf⟩−⟨θ,cf′⟩∣≤⟨∣θ∣,∣c∣∣f−f′∣⟩≤N1(f−f′)
for all c∈B1. The lemma is thus established.
Passing to the proof of Proposition 2, let us apply the lemma to the function uh, where h belongs to K+(T). This yields:
⟨∣θ∣,∣uh∣⟩=c∈K1sup∣⟨θ,cuh⟩∣=c∈K1sup∣⟨u⋅θ,ch⟩∣=⟨∣u⋅θ∣,h⟩.
However, the first member is also equal to
⟨∣θ∣,∣u∣h⟩=⟨∣u∣⋅∣θ∣,h⟩.
The two measures ∣u∣⋅∣θ∣ and ∣u⋅θ∣ are therefore equal.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.