Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 095A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 095A].

Integration, V, p. 71, § 6. Images of a measure

Suppose g≥0g \geq 0 and locally μ\mu-integrable. Then, the image under GG of the positive measure g⋅μg \cdot \mu is Lebesgue measure on G(I)G(I). For a function ff, defined on G(I)G(I), with values in R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}} or in a Banach space, to be integrable on G(I)G(I) for Lebesgue measure, it is necessary and sufficient that the function t↦f(G(t))g(t)t \mapsto f(G(t))g(t) be integrable on II for Lebesgue measure, in which case the relation (13) holds.

The first part of the statement follows from the fact that the formula (12) is valid for every function f∈K(G(I))f \in \mathscr{K}(G(I)); for, the support of the function t↦f(G(t))t \mapsto f(G(t)) is contained in an interval K⊂IK \subset I on which gg is integrable, by virtue of the above remarks, and it suffices to apply Prop. 8 to KK. The second part is a consequence of Th. 1 of No. 2.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.