Remark
Tag 0971, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0971].
Integration, chapter V, § 8. Products of measures
Lemmas 1,2,3 can be proved very simply without making use of the results of §§4 and 6, by a direct argument. For example, the relation (2) is obvious by definition if . If is lower semi-continuous on , it suffices to observe that is the upper envelope of the functions , where runs over the set of functions in such that . Finally, for arbitrary , one notes that if is lower semi-continuous on , then is lower semi-continuous on ; and conversely, if is lower semi-continuous on and is such that for all , then the function such that , for , is lower semi-continuous on and satisfies . Once Lemma 1 is proved, one deduces from it that the set is -negligible, and it is then every easy to prove Lemmas 2 and 3.
The relation (3) permits denoting its two members by without risk of confusion. The analogous results obviously hold for the measures .
Instead of the notations
we shall employ the notations
consistent with the notations adopted in Ch. III, §4, No. 1.
The interpretation of the measure as an integral will allow us to translate the results of §3 into the language of product measures. On the other hand, the measure is carried by , so that this integral defines a decomposition of into slices, relative to the projection of onto (§6, No. 6). Before giving a list of the results so obtained, here is a useful property:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.