Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 097J, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 097J].

Integration, chapter V, § 8. Products of measures

— For every pair of numerical functions f≥0f \geq 0, f′≥0f' \geq 0 defined on TT and T′T', *respectively,

∬∙f(t)f′(t′) dμ(t) dμ′(t′)=(∫∙f(t) dμ(t))(∫∙f′(t′) dμ′(t′)). \iint^\bullet f(t)f'(t')\, d\mu(t)\, d\mu'(t') = \left( \int^\bullet f(t)\, d\mu(t) \right) \left( \int^\bullet f'(t')\, d\mu'(t') \right).

We begin by treating the case that μ\mu and μ′\mu' are measures with compact support; the same is then true of μ⊗μ′\mu \otimes \mu', and all of the symbols ∫∙\int^\bullet, ∬∙\iint^\bullet may be replaced by upper integrals. By Prop. 6,

∬∗f(t)f′(t′) dμ(t) dμ′(t′)≥∫∗dμ(t)∫∗f(t)f′(t′) dμ′(t′) \iint^* f(t)f'(t')\, d\mu(t)\, d\mu'(t') \geq \int^* d\mu(t) \int^* f(t)f'(t')\, d\mu'(t')
=(∫∗f(t) dμ(t))(∫∗f′(t′) dμ′(t′)). = \left( \int^* f(t)\, d\mu(t) \right) \left( \int^* f'(t')\, d\mu'(t') \right).

To establish the reverse inequality, let us choose a function h≥fh \geq f (resp. h′≥f′h' \geq f'), the lower envelope of a sequence (hn)(h_n) (resp. (hn′)(h'_n)) of lower semi-continuous functions, such that

∫∗h(t) dμ(t)=∫∗f(t) dμ(t) \int^* h(t)\, d\mu(t) = \int^* f(t)\, d\mu(t)

(resp. ∫∗h′(t′) dμ′(t′)=∫∗f′(t′) dμ′(t′)\int^* h'(t')\, d\mu'(t') = \int^* f'(t')\, d\mu'(t')); the existence of such functions follows immediately from the definition of upper integral (Ch. IV, §1, No. 3, Def. 3) and Lebesgue’s theorem. Applying Prop. 7 to the measurable function h⊗h′h \otimes h', we have

∬∗f(t)f′(t′) dμ(t) dμ′(t′)≤∬∗h(t)h′(t′) dμ(t) dμ′(t′) \iint^* f(t)f'(t')\, d\mu(t)\, d\mu'(t') \leq \iint^* h(t)h'(t')\, d\mu(t)\, d\mu'(t')
=(∫∗h(t) dμ(t))(∫∗h′(t′) dμ′(t′)) = \left( \int^* h(t)\, d\mu(t) \right) \left( \int^* h'(t')\, d\mu'(t') \right)
=(∫∗f(t) dμ(t))(∫∗f′(t′) dμ′(t′)), = \left( \int^* f(t)\, d\mu(t) \right) \left( \int^* f'(t')\, d\mu'(t') \right),

which is the sought-for inequality. Thus the proposition is established when μ\mu and μ′\mu' are measures with compact support. To treat the general case, it suffices to represent μ\mu (resp. μ′\mu') as the sum of a family (μα)α∈A(\mu_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} (resp. (μβ′)β∈B(\mu'_\beta)_{\beta \in B}) of measures with compact support (§ 2, No. 3, Prop. 4), write the formula (10) for each measure μα⊗μβ′\mu_\alpha \otimes \mu'_\beta, and sum on (α,β)(\alpha, \beta), taking into account Prop. 1 (§ 2, No. 2, Prop. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.