Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 09A6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09A6].

Integration, VI, p. 20, § 2. Vectorial measures . "

Let mm be a vectorial measure on TT with values in FF, ff a numerical function on TT that is essentially integrable for mm. The mapping

z′↦∫f d(z′∘m)+−∫f d(z′∘m)− z' \mapsto \int f \, d(z' \circ m)^+ - \int f \, d(z' \circ m)^-
is a linear form on F′F'.

Denoting this mapping by Φ\Phi, it is immediate that Φ(λz′)=λΦ(z′)\Phi(\lambda z') = \lambda \Phi(z') for all λ∈R\lambda \in \mathbf{R}. Everything comes down to showing that Φ(y′+z′)=Φ(y′)+Φ(z′)\Phi(y' + z') = \Phi(y') + \Phi(z'). Set μ=∣y′∘m∣+∣z′∘m∣\mu = |y' \circ m| + |z' \circ m|; by the Lebesgue–Nikodym theorem, one can then write y′∘m=g⋅μy' \circ m = g \cdot \mu and z′∘m=h⋅μz' \circ m = h \cdot \mu, where gg and hh are two bounded and locally μ\mu-integrable numerical functions (Ch. V, §5, No. 5, Th. 2); moreover, (y′∘m)+=g+⋅μ(y' \circ m)^+ = g^+ \cdot \mu and (y′∘m)−=g−⋅μ(y' \circ m)^- = g^- \cdot \mu, and the analogous relations hold with y′y' replaced by z′z' (resp. y′+z′y' + z') and gg by hh (resp. g+hg + h). This being so, it is immediate that ff is essentially μ\mu-integrable (Ch. V, §2, No. 2, Cor. 1 of Prop. 3), and the relation to be proved reduces to (g+h)+−(g+h)−=(g+−g−)+(h+−h−)(g + h)^+ - (g + h)^- = (g^+ - g^-) + (h^+ - h^-), which is obvious.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.