Bourbaki

Lemma 5

Tag 09B6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09B6].

Integration, VI, p. 37, § 2. Vectorial measures . "

Let m be a complex measure on T, f an m-integrable complex function. Then ∫∣f∣ d∣m∣=sup⁡∣∫fh dm∣\int |f|\, d|m| = \sup |\int fh\, dm|, as h runs over the set of functions in HC(T)\mathscr{H}_C(T) such that ∣h(t)∣≤1|h(t)| \leq 1 for all t∈Tt \in T.

⁶Cf. Ch. III, §1, No. 8.

If m=g⋅∣m∣m = g \cdot |m|, then ∫∣f∣d∣m∣=∫∣fg∣d∣m∣\int |f| d|m| = \int |f g| d|m| and ∫fh dm=∫fgh d∣m∣\int f h \, dm = \int f g h \, d|m|. Set ζ(t)=0\zeta(t) = 0 when f(t)g(t)=0f(t)g(t) = 0, and ζ(t)=f(t)g(t)∣f(t)g(t)∣\zeta(t) = \frac{f(t)g(t)}{|f(t)g(t)|} when f(t)g(t)≠0f(t)g(t) \neq 0; ζ\zeta is ∣m∣|m|-measurable, thus for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists a compact subset K of T such that ∫T−K∣f∣ d∣m∣≤ε\int_{T-K} |f| \, d|m| \leq \varepsilon, the restriction of ζ\zeta to K is continuous, and ∣ζ(t)∣=1|\zeta(t)| = 1 on K. Therefore, by virtue of Urysohn’s theorem, there exists a continuous function ζ1\zeta_1 defined on T, with complex values, such that ζ1=ζ\zeta_1 = \zeta on K and such that ∣ζ1(t)∣≤2|\zeta_1(t)| \leq 2 and ζ1(t)≠0\zeta_1(t) \neq 0 for every t∈Tt \in T; setting h(t)=ζ1(t)/∣ζ1(t)∣h(t) = \zeta_1(t)/|\zeta_1(t)|, we see that hh is continuous on T, coincides with ζ\zeta on K, and is such that ∣h(t)∣=1|h(t)| = 1 for all t∈Tt \in T. Finally, let uu be a continuous mapping of T into [0,1][0,1], equal to 1 on K and with compact support; setting h1=h−1uh_1 = h^{-1}u, we have

∣∫fh1 dm−∫∣f∣ d∣m∣∣≤2∫T−K∣f∣ d∣m∣≤2ε, \left| \int f h_1 \, dm - \int |f| \, d|m| \right| \leq 2 \int_{T-K} |f| \, d|m| \leq 2\varepsilon ,
which proves the lemma.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.