Let m be a complex measure on T, f an m-integrable complex function. Then ∫∣f∣d∣m∣=sup∣∫fhdm∣, as h runs over the set of functions in HC(T) such that ∣h(t)∣≤1 for all t∈T.
⁶Cf. Ch. III, §1, No. 8.
If m=g⋅∣m∣, then ∫∣f∣d∣m∣=∫∣fg∣d∣m∣ and ∫fhdm=∫fghd∣m∣. Set ζ(t)=0 when f(t)g(t)=0, and ζ(t)=∣f(t)g(t)∣f(t)g(t) when f(t)g(t)=0; ζ is ∣m∣-measurable, thus for every ε>0 there exists a compact subset K of T such that ∫T−K∣f∣d∣m∣≤ε, the restriction of ζ to K is continuous, and ∣ζ(t)∣=1 on K. Therefore, by virtue of Urysohn’s theorem, there exists a continuous function ζ1 defined on T, with complex values, such that ζ1=ζ on K and such that ∣ζ1(t)∣≤2 and ζ1(t)=0 for every t∈T; setting h(t)=ζ1(t)/∣ζ1(t)∣, we see that h is continuous on T, coincides with ζ on K, and is such that ∣h(t)∣=1 for all t∈T. Finally, let u be a continuous mapping of T into [0,1], equal to 1 on K and with compact support; setting h1=h−1u, we have
∫fh1dm−∫∣f∣d∣m∣≤2∫T−K∣f∣d∣m∣≤2ε,
which proves the lemma.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.