With hypotheses and notations as in Prop. 4, λ is called the quotient of μ by β and is denoted βμ or μ/β.
The mapping λ↦λ# of M(X/H) into M(X) is none other than the transpose of the mapping f↦fb of K(X) into K(X/H). Let F be a filter on M(X/H); to say that limλ,Fλ#(f)=0 for all f∈K(X) is equivalent to saying that limλ,Fλ(f′)=0 for all f′∈K(X/H); therefore the mapping λ↦λ# is, for the vague topologies, an isomorphism of M(X/H) onto a linear subspace of M(X). This subspace is vaguely closed, since it is the set of μ∈M(X) such that δ(ξ)μ=ΔH(ξ)μ for all ξ∈H. It is clear that the conditions λ⩾0 and λ#⩾0 are equivalent.
The formula (6) may, by analogy with the usual notation for double integrals, be written
∫Xf(x)dλ#(x)=∫X/Hdλ(x˙)∫Hf(xξ)dβ(ξ)(x˙=π(x)). This involves an abuse of notation, the integral
∫Hf(xξ)dβ(ξ) being regarded as a function of
x˙ and not of
x; this manner of writing will be used frequently in what follows provided no confusion can arise.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.