Let K be a compact subset of X/H', and L a compact subset of X. Then ⋃x∈Lωx−1(K) is relatively compact in H/H'.
Let K1 be a compact subset of X such that π′(K1)=K. Let K2 be the set of ξ∈H such that Lξ intersects K1. Then K2 is compact (GT, III, §4, No. 5, Th. 1). Let ξ∈H be such that p(ξ)∈⋃x∈Lωx−1(K). Thus, there exists an x∈L such that ωx(p(ξ))∈K, in other words such that π′(xξ)∈K. Since π′(K1)=K, there exists ξ′∈H′ such that xξξ′∈K1. Then ξξ′∈K2, therefore p(ξ)=p(ξξ′)∈p(K2). We have thus shown that ⋃x∈Lωx−1(K)⊂p(K2).
This lemma shows first of all that the mapping ωx is proper. One can therefore form the measure ωx(β/β′) on X/H′, which is concentrated on ωx(H/H′)=π′(ψx(H))=π′(xH). If f∈K(X/H′), Lemma 7 and §1, No. 1, Lemma 1 show that the function x↦⟨f,ωx(β/β′)⟩ is continuous on X; moreover, ⟨f,ωx(β/β′)⟩ is zero when Supp f does not intersect π′(xH), in other words when π(x) does not belong to the canonical image of Supp f in X/H.
Moreover, if x∈H then
ωxξ(β/β′)=ωx(γH/H′(ξ)(β/β′))=ωx(β/β′).
The mapping x↦ωx(β/β′) of X into M(X/H′) therefore defines by passage to the quotient a mapping u↦(β/β′)u of X/H into M(X/H′). The foregoing shows that, for every f∈K(X/H′), the mapping u↦⟨f,(β/β′)u⟩ is continuous with compact support. Consequently the mapping u↦(β/β′)u is a vaguely continuous and (μ/β)*-adequate family of measures on* X/H′, with X/H as index set.
Let x∈X, and u=π(x)∈X/H. Let f be a function on X/H′, with values in a Banach space or in R. By Ch. V, §4, Th. 2, for f to be (β/β′)u-integrable, it is necessary and sufficient that the function p(ξ)↦f(ωx(p(ξ)))=f(π′(xξ)) on H/H′ be (β/β′)-integrable, in which case
(21)∫X/H′f(u′)d(β/β′)u(u′)=∫H/H′f(π′(xξ))d(β/β′)(ξ˙)(ξ˙=p(ξ)).
One has analogous properties for measurability, the upper integral and the essential integral.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.