Let (f1,f2,…,fn) be a basis of E. a) *There exists one and only one orthonormal basis (e1,e2,…,en) of E such that fi=e1αi1+e2αi2+⋯+eiαii (i=1,2,…,n) with αii>0 for all i. b) For fixed Φ, the ei and αij depend continuously on (f1,…,fn)∈En.
Let Ei=f1K+f2K+⋯+fiK, which has dimension i. Let gi be a nonzero element of Ei orthogonal to Ei−1 and such that Φ(gi,gi)=1. By induction on i, one sees that (g1,…,gi) is an orthonormal basis of Ei. In particular, (g1,…,gn) is an orthonormal basis of E. Let λi=Φ(fi,gi). Since fi∈/Ei−1, one has λi=0. Set ei=gi∣λi∣λi−1. Then
Φ(ei,ei)=∣λi∣2λi−1Φ(gi,gi)λi−1=1,
thus (e1,…,ei) is also an orthonormal basis of Ei; moreover, Φ(ei,fi)=∣λi∣λi−1Φ(gi,fi)=∣λi∣>0, thus the ei have the properties of a). Let (e1′,…,en′) be another orthonormal basis of E with the same properties. One sees by induction on i that (e1′,…,ei′) must be a basis of Ei, therefore ei′=eiμi for some μi∈K. Then
1=Φ(ei′,ei′)=μiΦ(ei,ei)μi=μiμi,
and 0<Φ(ei′,fi)=μiΦ(ei,fi), therefore μi>0 and μi2=1, thus μi=1, whence a). Suppose already proven that the ei and αij depend continuously on (f1,…,fn) for i<i0, and let us prove that ei0 and the αi0j depend continuously on (f1,…,fn). For j<i0, αi0j=Φ(fi0,ej) depends continuously on (f1,…,fn) by the induction hypothesis. On the other hand,
Φ(fi0,fi0)=∣αi01∣2+∣αi02∣2+⋯+∣αi0,i0−1∣2+αi0i02,
thus αi0i0 depends continuously on (f1,…,fn). Therefore
ei0=(fi0−e1αi01−⋯−ei0−1αi0,i0−1)αi0i0−1
depends continuously on (f1,…,fn).
Henceforth let E=Kn and let us take for Φ the form
x1y1+⋯+xnyn.
Recall that U(n,K) denotes the corresponding unitary group. Even when K is noncommutative, we shall again denote by T1(n,K) the group of upper triangular matrices of Mn(K) whose diagonal entries are all 1.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.