Bourbaki

Lemma 10

Tag 09HI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09HI].

Integration, VII, p. 69, § 3. Applications and examples

Let (f1,f2,…,fn)(f_1, f_2, \ldots, f_n) be a basis of E. a) *There exists one and only one orthonormal basis (e1,e2,…,en)(e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_n) of E such that fi=e1αi1+e2αi2+⋯+eiαiif_i = e_1 \alpha_{i1} + e_2 \alpha_{i2} + \cdots + e_i \alpha_{ii} (i=1,2,…,ni = 1, 2, \ldots, n) with αii>0\alpha_{ii} > 0 for all ii. b) For fixed Φ\Phi, the eie_i and αij\alpha_{ij} depend continuously on (f1,…,fn)∈En(f_1, \ldots, f_n) \in E^n.

Let Ei=f1K+f2K+⋯+fiKE_i = f_1 K + f_2 K + \cdots + f_i K, which has dimension ii. Let gig_i be a nonzero element of EiE_i orthogonal to Ei−1E_{i-1} and such that Φ(gi,gi)=1\Phi(g_i, g_i) = 1. By induction on ii, one sees that (g1,…,gi)(g_1, \ldots, g_i) is an orthonormal basis of EiE_i. In particular, (g1,…,gn)(g_1, \ldots, g_n) is an orthonormal basis of EE. Let λi=Φ(fi,gi)\lambda_i = \Phi(f_i, g_i). Since fi∉Ei−1f_i \notin E_{i-1}, one has λi≠0\lambda_i \neq 0. Set ei=gi∣λi∣λi−1e_i = g_i |\lambda_i| \lambda_i^{-1}. Then

Φ(ei,ei)=∣λi∣2λi‾−1Φ(gi,gi)λi−1=1, \Phi(e_i, e_i) = |\lambda_i|^2 \overline{\lambda_i}^{-1} \Phi(g_i, g_i) \lambda_i^{-1} = 1,

thus (e1,…,ei)(e_1, \ldots, e_i) is also an orthonormal basis of EiE_i; moreover, Φ(ei,fi)=∣λi∣λi‾−1Φ(gi,fi)=∣λi∣>0\Phi(e_i, f_i) = |\lambda_i| \overline{\lambda_i}^{-1} \Phi(g_i, f_i) = |\lambda_i| > 0, thus the eie_i have the properties of a). Let (e1′,…,en′)(e'_1, \ldots, e'_n) be another orthonormal basis of EE with the same properties. One sees by induction on ii that (e1′,…,ei′)(e'_1, \ldots, e'_i) must be a basis of EiE_i, therefore ei′=eiμie'_i = e_i \mu_i for some μi∈K\mu_i \in \mathbf{K}. Then

1=Φ(ei′,ei′)=μi‾Φ(ei,ei)μi=μi‾μi, 1 = \Phi(e'_i, e'_i) = \overline{\mu_i} \Phi(e_i, e_i) \mu_i = \overline{\mu_i} \mu_i ,

and 0<Φ(ei′,fi)=μi‾Φ(ei,fi)0 < \Phi(e'_i, f_i) = \overline{\mu_i} \Phi(e_i, f_i), therefore μi>0\mu_i > 0 and μi2=1\mu_i^2 = 1, thus μi=1\mu_i = 1, whence a). Suppose already proven that the eie_i and αij\alpha_{ij} depend continuously on (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n) for i<i0i < i_0, and let us prove that ei0e_{i_0} and the αi0j\alpha_{i_0 j} depend continuously on (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n). For j<i0j < i_0, α‾i0j=Φ(fi0,ej)\overline{\alpha}_{i_0 j} = \Phi(f_{i_0}, e_j) depends continuously on (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n) by the induction hypothesis. On the other hand,

Φ(fi0,fi0)=∣αi01∣2+∣αi02∣2+⋯+∣αi0,i0−1∣2+αi0i02, \Phi(f_{i_0}, f_{i_0}) = |\alpha_{i_0 1}|^2 + |\alpha_{i_0 2}|^2 + \cdots + |\alpha_{i_0, i_0 - 1}|^2 + \alpha_{i_0 i_0}^2 ,

thus αi0i0\alpha_{i_0 i_0} depends continuously on (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n). Therefore

ei0=(fi0−e1αi01−⋯−ei0−1αi0,i0−1)αi0i0−1 e_{i_0} = (f_{i_0} - e_1 \alpha_{i_0 1} - \cdots - e_{i_0 - 1} \alpha_{i_0, i_0 - 1}) \alpha_{i_0 i_0}^{-1}

depends continuously on (f1,…,fn)(f_1, \ldots, f_n).

Henceforth let E=KnE = K^n and let us take for Φ\Phi the form

x‾1y1+⋯+x‾nyn. \overline{x}_1 y_1 + \cdots + \overline{x}_n y_n .

Recall that U(n,K)\mathbf{U}(n, \mathbf{K}) denotes the corresponding unitary group. Even when K\mathbf{K} is noncommutative, we shall again denote by T1(n,K)\mathbf{T}_1(n, \mathbf{K}) the group of upper triangular matrices of Mn(K)\mathbf{M}_n(\mathbf{K}) whose diagonal entries are all 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.