Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 09I0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09I0].

Integration, chapter VIII, § 1. Convolution

*Let X1,…,XnX_1, \ldots, X_n be locally compact spaces, μi\mu_i a measure on XiX_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n); let X be the product of the XiX_i, μ\mu that of the μi\mu_i. Let φ\varphi be a mapping of X into a locally compact space Y. One says that the sequence (μi)(\mu_i) is φ\varphi-convolvable, or that μ1,…,μn\mu_1, \ldots, \mu_n are φ\varphi-convolvable, if φ\varphi is μ\mu-proper; in this case, the image ν=φ(μ)\nu = \varphi(\mu) of μ\mu under φ\varphi is called the convolution product of the μi\mu_i for φ\varphi, and is denoted ∗φ(μi)1≤i≤n*_{\varphi}(\mu_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n}, or ∗i=1nμi*_{i=1}^n \mu_i, or μ1∗μ2∗⋯∗μn\mu_1 * \mu_2 * \cdots * \mu_n.

The last two notations are of course used only when there can be no doubt as to φ\varphi.

Let f be a function on Y, with values in a Banach space or in R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}}. In order that f be essentially integrable for μ1∗⋯∗μn\mu_1 * \cdots * \mu_n, it is necessary and sufficient that the function

(x1,…,xn)↦f(φ(x1,…,xn)) (x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto f(\varphi(x_1, \ldots, x_n))

be essentially integrable for μ1⊗μ2⊗⋯⊗μn\mu_1 \otimes \mu_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mu_n, in which case

(1)∫f d(μ1∗⋯∗μn)=∫f(φ(x1,…,xn))dμ1(x1)…dμn(xn), (1) \quad \int f\ d(\mu_1 * \cdots * \mu_n) = \int f(\varphi(x_1, \ldots, x_n)) d\mu_1(x_1) \ldots d\mu_n(x_n),

a formula that may be regarded as defining μ1∗⋯∗μn\mu_1 * \cdots * \mu_n when one takes f∈K(Y)f \in \mathscr{K}(Y).

The definitions imply at once that the μi\mu_i are convolvable if and only if the ∣μi∣|\mu_i| are. When this is the case,

∣φ(μ1⊗⋯⊗μn)∣≤φ(∣μ1⊗⋯⊗μn∣)=φ(∣μ1∣⊗⋯⊗∣μn∣) |\varphi(\mu_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mu_n)| \leq \varphi(|\mu_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mu_n|) = \varphi(|\mu_1| \otimes \cdots \otimes |\mu_n|)
(Ch. VI, §2, No. 10), that is,

(2)∣∗iμi∣≤∗i∣μi∣. (2) \quad |*_i \mu_i| \leq *_i |\mu_i|.

If the μi\mu_i are convolvable and positive, and if νi\nu_i is a measure on XiX_i such that 0≤νi≤μi0 \leq \nu_i \leq \mu_i, then the νi\nu_i are convolvable and

∗iνi≤∗iμi. *_i \nu_i \leq *_i \mu_i.

Suppose μ1,μ2,…,μn\mu_1, \mu_2, \ldots, \mu_n are convolvable, and that μ1′,μ2,…,μn\mu'_1, \mu_2, \ldots, \mu_n are convolvable (μ1′\mu'_1 being a measure on X1X_1). By Ch. V, §6, No. 3, Cor. 1 of Prop. 6, μ1+μ1′,μ2,…,μn\mu_1 + \mu'_1, \mu_2, \ldots, \mu_n are convolvable and

(μ1+μ1′)∗μ2∗⋯∗μn=μ1∗μ2∗⋯∗μn+μ1′∗μ2∗⋯∗μn. (\mu_1 + \mu'_1) * \mu_2 * \cdots * \mu_n = \mu_1 * \mu_2 * \cdots * \mu_n + \mu'_1 * \mu_2 * \cdots * \mu_n.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.